| 查看: 5495 | 回复: 16 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wengang将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
编辑部回信，几个意思？ 已有6人参与
|
||
|
各位大牛，帮忙看看，昨天收到编辑部回信，这个届时录用的概率有多大？谢谢！ 回信内容如下： Dear Mr. XXX, please accept our sincere apologies for not responding, .... Regarding your manuscript entitled "XXXXXX", it was accepted for the publication in the XXX after some necessary adjustments to your manuscript according to the internal review by Editorial Board. However, currently, around 80-100 earlier manuscripts are in the review process. Since we publish approximately 40 papers per year, therefore, your manuscript can be published no earlier than 2019-2020. If you agree with these conditions, before we can start with the review process, please re-write your manuscript according to "Instructions for authors" (https://..., or use our Template (http:...). The Abstract should have at least 200 words. The total length of an article, including illustrations and tables to be inserted in the text, should not exceed 15 pages of A4 format. Regarding References, only the author-date system of references style (Harvard or APA style) is acceptable, therefore, please correct the system of citations in your manuscript. At the same time, we would be very grateful if you could use the possibility to cite some of relevant works published in the Acta Montanistica Slovaca Journal during last two years, if possible. Also, please check English language in the manuscript. After you adjust it according to these instructions, we can start with the double blind peer review process prior to publication. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有7人回复
-
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
-
找导师
已经有8人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
面上意见出来了
已经有23人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- 【转】裸奔的Barabasi
已经有10人回复
- plose one 投稿注意事项
已经有20人回复
- SCI投稿过程总结
已经有124人回复
- 这个算是审稿意见吗？
已经有7人回复
ys322
铜虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5325.3
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 638
- 在线: 204.7小时
- 虫号: 916773
- 注册: 2009-11-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化工系统工程
3楼2017-08-14 10:33:33
fqcgfqcgfqcg
木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 93 (初中生)
- 金币: 1689.4
- 散金: 30984
- 红花: 80
- 帖子: 23129
- 在线: 562.1小时
- 虫号: 1181703
- 注册: 2011-01-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 法医学
2楼2017-08-14 10:25:14
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
4楼2017-08-14 10:39:52
ipublish_SCI 
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 应助: 178 (高中生)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 232
- 红花: 24
- 帖子: 399
- 在线: 104.9小时
- 虫号: 7056251
- 注册: 2017-08-13
- 专业: 生物大分子结构与功能
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
| It's not normal. I have experience publishing, editing and reviewing, and have never seen a letter like that. They ask you to cite works of the Acta Motanistica, obviously to increase their citation count. Normally, any good journal would not mention that, at least so explicitly. But I cannot tell much more with this little information. Perhaps this can help. Feel free to reply or contact me. Good luck |
5楼2017-08-14 14:07:16