24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1958  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者已飞的鹰将赠送您 9 个金币

已飞的鹰

铁虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 编辑给修改重投,但没可能搭建实验系统补实验,各位说说重投机会多大?谢谢 已有4人参与

We regret to inform you that your Paper is not suitable for publication in Journal of Optics in its current form. The changes requested by the referees are substantial and are too significant to warrant a revision of the article in its current form. However, the referee(s) feel that if you rewrite the article as explained in the referee reports, including any further work recommended, it may then be suitable for reconsideration.

**The two original referees returned conflicting recommendations regarding publication
and so the paper and the referee reports were sent to a member fo the Editorial Board for adjudication.  
On this occasion the adjudicator has agreed with the rejecting referee.**

If you wish to rewrite your Paper, please take the referee comments fully into account and provide point-by-point responses with a full list of changes. We will treat the rewritten article as a new submission with a new article reference number and it will be peer reviewed again.  Although we will go back to the previous referees for their opinion where possible, we may also contact further referees in order to ensure that the rewritten article meets our high quality and interest criteria. If it does not, the new version of the manuscript will be rejected.

You can resubmit your revised manuscript here: *** PLEASE NOTE: This is a two-step process. After clicking on the link, you will be directed to a webpage to confirm. ***

审稿人主要意见:“ I strongly hope the authors should finish the experiment test and then prove the simulation results are all right.”
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lotuscsx: 金币+1, 鼓励交流。 2017-08-14 06:00:52
编辑给修改重投,但没可能搭建实验系统补实验,各位说说重投机会多大?谢谢

给了修改机会,就要好好修改,如果没有可能补充实验,详细说明就行
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
2楼2017-08-13 19:21:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
已飞的鹰(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-14 09:48:15
模拟的结果需要实验数据验证,没有条件做实验,如果不能从已经发表的权威文献获得相应数据,重投被接收的可能性不大。
咱也是有组织的人了...
3楼2017-08-13 20:03:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
4楼2017-08-13 23:05:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peterflyer

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

peterflyer


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
I strongly hope ...。不按审稿人的强烈要求完成实验,估计在审稿人那里肯定通不过,机会不大。
5楼2017-08-13 23:35:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lotuscsx

版主 (知名作家)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
I strongly hope the authors should finish the experiment test and then prove the simulation results are all right.
想满足审稿人的这个要求其实需要下大功夫,可能需要大量的实验验证,属于大修的大修吧。
6楼2017-08-14 06:01:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 已飞的鹰 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见