24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4769)
>导师招生 (1008)
>文献求助 (345)
>考研 (330)
>虫友互识 (303)
>硕博家园 (286)
>招聘信息布告栏 (274)
>考博 (240)
>博后之家 (226)
>生物材料 (143)
>找工作 (130)
>海外博后 (112)
>休闲灌水 (58)
>论文投稿 (48)
>基金申请 (38)
>教师之家 (34)

返回列表

hl89119924

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

123

应助: 14 (小学生)
金币: 15311.2
散金: 465
红花: 21
帖子: 3421
在线: 484.3小时
虫号: 2692057
注册: 2013-09-30
性别: GG
专业: 其他无机非金属材料

[求助] 本人投了一篇微晶玻璃的论文，审稿意见回来，好像是做陶瓷的人帮... 已有1人参与

本人投了一篇微晶玻璃的论文，审稿意见回来，好像是做陶瓷的人帮忙审的，给的意见看得人一脸懵逼。各位大神们，帮我看看这个审稿人到底让干什么？该怎么修改？

审稿意见如下:

The work of "**" is mostly experimental in nature and devoted to the study of glass-ceramic systems based on oxides of silicon and boron.

In the study of work, I would highlight the following drawback. The absence of a fundamental theory. Experimental data confirming the properties of the system under study is given in full. However, the study of ceramics-forming systems containing two or more stekloobrazovaniya requires serious theoretical justification. The authors can be published, however, I'd recommend adding a theoretical justification tracked in spectroscopy patterns for the studied system. Moreover, all of them basically fit into the concept of a Stanworth (Homopolar connection concept).
上面中的从the study of theceramics-forming到完都不是很理解，请陶瓷方面的大神给解释解释要干什么 @chinaworm

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼