24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3789)
>文献求助 (410)
>导师招生 (345)
>虫友互识 (336)
>休闲灌水 (216)
>考博 (162)
>硕博家园 (115)
>招聘信息布告栏 (113)
>博后之家 (93)
>论文投稿 (83)
>基金申请 (65)
>公派出国 (55)
>考研 (55)
>论文道贺祈福 (52)
>找工作 (40)
>教师之家 (35)

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

世外桃源008

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 0.1
散金: 390
红花: 3
帖子: 387
在线: 224.7小时
虫号: 447299
注册: 2007-10-31
性别: GG
专业: 功能与智能高分子

[交流] 【求助】大年30得到投稿回复，大家帮我看看

这篇论文是在前两个星期前投出去的，写的不好，因为是第一次写英文的，所以就花了一个月写出来。投出去就没有管，昨天打开信箱看到回信，这样写的：
Dear Dr.
We have received two reviews of your manuscript, REACT-D-09-000xx, submitted to REACTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS.

As you see the reviewers' comments appended below, it appears that a substabtial revision with supplementary experiments and discussions is required before any consideration of this paper for the publication in REACTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS.

We would proceed to further evaluation of your paper only when we could receive an appropriately revised manuscript, which is carefully taken into account the comments and criticism by both reviewers.  In particular, the reviewer 1 feels that additional and extensive experiments are duly needed to show the diverse functionalization shown in Scheme 2.  I tend to agree with the reviewer.  In addition, supplementary results on the further characterization and better resolution photos of the products should be included by responding to the comments by both reviewers.
When you return the revised manuscript, please indicate your specific point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments.  If any of the suggestions were not included in your revision, we should know that, too.  And in the revised manuscript, the revised parts are highlighted or marked.

Also I would like to invite you to cite recent literatures from THIS journal in this acitive research field.

And please note;
1. Abstract should be condensed into 10 lines.
2. The submission of your manuscript by EES should be conducted according to Instructions.  The text file (DOUBLE SPACE) with Figure captions (in separate page), Figures, and Tables should be uploaded separately. Reference section should follow the style of THIS journal.
3. Please follow carefully EES submission instructions, and CHECK the final form including the quality of Figures.
4. If you have any questions, please contact with EES support service(authorsupport@elsevier.com).

To submit a revision, please go to http:// and login as an Author.

If you cant remember your password please click on the "Send Password" link on the login page.

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (eg Word).  Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication.  If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

Yours sincerely,

Editor
Reactive and Functional Polymers

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled as "Synthesis and characterization of XXXX" authored by xxxet. Al. (react-d-09-000xx) described a synthetic technique for preparing xxxxxxxxxx. These two techniques have been widely used in structure modification of synthetic polymers or life materials. There were numerous papers published in the past few years. The author should emphasize the difference or novelty of current technique compared to the numerous existed techniques in literatures. The manuscript should not be published in this Journal as current status. Major reversion and more data should be provided for further consideration according to the following comments:
1. The authors showed various functional groups can be end-capped onto polymer end via the reported technique in Scheme 2. However, they only provide the experimental data of carboxyl functionalization in manuscript. How about others? The detailed results should be presented in manuscript.
2. The surface initiated ATRP of styrene from silia nanoparticle has been carried out. The end-functionality of bromine in polymer end was very important in current technique. However, the author didn't provide this data in manuscript. Only a reference cited there is not enough. Furthermore, the monomers in cited references were different with current manuscript (acrylates in references and styrene in this manuscript). It is hard to compare these two kinds of monomers. Thus, the end-functionality of polystyrene should be determined. Actually, there were many techniques have been developed in literatures for preparing polymers with high degree of end-functionality via ATRP. Why the author using the current one? Is there any reasons?
6. The integral value of each peak should be given in NMR spectra (Figure 2). This value should be helpful in end-functionality determination.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript describes synthesis of xxxxxxx. The experiment in carefully done and the results are academically and industrially interesting and important, since both of xxxxxxx are versatile methods. The reviewer recommends accepting after revision of followings.

(1) Results of GPC are written only in the text. A table makes it easy to understand.
(2) In page 8, Eq. (1), "Bare silic" should be "Bare silica".
(3) In page 9, line 15, "HCI" should be "HCl".
(4) In page 11, line 11 and 18, "adsorption peak" should be "absorption peak".

两个审稿人，第一个指出了11个大的问题，有的一个问题里有几个小的问题。我这列了3个，其他几个是句子不通或单词写错了。要让大修。第二个人问题就是找出了几个小的错误，在第一个人得问题里。所以第一个人的问题难办。我现在在家过年，打算正月初十在去学校，这几天车票买不上。不过人家能给个修改的机会我也很满意了，我想的是人家可能就直接给拒了。
现在问题是这样，第一个人的第一个意见很麻烦，我做的是聚合物包裹二氧化硅，用苯乙烯，然后末端溴用其他化合物取代，在这步我和其它四个化合物反应，而我在实验过程和讨论中只用一个化合物来说明这种方法。所以第一个人得意见要我把其他的几个也加进去表征和讨论，如果说把其他三个化合物也加进去表针和讨论，所有的图都得重新做，在加那么多东西我害怕写的越写越乱。所以这个问题要增加很多内容。我今天考虑了一下，如果增加其他三个，试验部分在最后两步不一样，增加很简单；在讨论部分，红外我就不加那三个得图了，只在氢谱上把其他几个得图加上。因为这篇文章我主要是体现合成方法，所以我认为用氢谱才能表针我得合成是我想要的结构。热重得图也不变，不加两外三个图。电镜也不加，如果加上电镜照片很多，本来得电镜照片是一个纯二氧化硅和一个化合物反应后得得电镜。最后反应得是小分子，所以热重电镜其实都说明不了问题。第二个问题我看得很不理解，二氧化硅表面用引发剂引发苯乙烯，ATRP，没有特别的，常用方法，末端溴需要测试，有一个文献说的是聚合丙烯酸，反应4小时后末端溴90%，我这里没有说多少，所以人家让我表针聚合后末端溴，是不是可以用元素分析测试算出来？或者用其他方法来测？我记得有个文献，好像用硝酸银滴定，不知道这样可以不？Actually, there were many techniques have been developed in literatures for preparing polymers with high degree of end-functionality via ATRP. Why the author using the current one? Is there any reasons? 这句话我就不知道什么意思了。我就是用的常规方法聚合，没有什么原因，我是要回答还是直接不用回答？第六个问题是氢谱得问题，他的意思是要把峰标出来还是给出全氢谱图，因为我的氢谱图只给出4~8之间，是不是要我给出全图？
第二个人得意见简单，第一个问题说道GPC，我没有给出图，第一个审稿人也让给出图，这个人让列表，我看列表简单，打算列个表。
请高手给予指导，第一次写文章，所以不知道怎么搞，大家给给意见。在这里谢啦！

[ Last edited by wizardfox on 2009-1-30 at 00:33 ]

回复此楼