| 查看: 6383 | 回复: 33 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者狐小狸123将赠送您 27 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
狐小狸123金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
文章大修，其中一个reviewer要求退稿，这个修改意见怎么回复呢？ 已有9人参与
|
|
|
文章大修，5个审稿人中4个修改，所以编辑让大修，但其中一个reviewer要求退稿，这个修改意见怎么回复呢？ This a common review paper and there are a lot of papers published in this subject. No new insight was provided in this manuscript in term of mechanism. In fact the reviewer could not find any conclusive discussion regarding to the developed process, and related characteristics. Taking into account that a large number of the articles have been published, already, on the subject of microcystin-LR. In conclusion, this paper is not recommended to publish. 各位大神，这条意见应该怎么回复呢？？谢谢啦！！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有21人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
30楼2017-07-04 12:01:55