24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3750  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

洪秀萍

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 《International Journal of Coal Geology》返修后又找审稿人 已有3人参与

4月份投到《International Journal of Coal Geology》的期刊,5月底一位审稿人给出中修意见,编辑说他只收到一位审稿人的审稿回应,给其他审稿人发出审稿邀请,但未作出回应。编辑说中修后应该会被录用。今天返修回去,编辑说他又重新邀请审稿人,让耐心等待。这期刊到底几个审稿人,况且编辑之前说中修后应该可以录用啊,为啥又重新找审稿人呢?被拒的可能性大吗?第一次投这个期刊,没什么经验,谢谢。下文是返修时编辑给写的信。

Ref: COGEL_2017_247
Title: Mercury emissions from dynamic monitoring holes of underground coal fires in the Wuda Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China
Journal: International Journal of Coal Geology

Dear Mr. Handong,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to International Journal of Coal Geology. I have received comments from one reviewer on your manuscript, whereas some other invited reviewers did not respond. Your paper should become acceptable for publication pending suitable moderate revision and modification of the article in light of the appended reviewer comments.

When resubmitting your manuscript, please carefully consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments, outline every change made point by point, and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peterflyer

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

peterflyer


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
洪秀萍: 金币+2 2017-06-26 22:30:21
洪秀萍(lotuscsx代发): 金币+1, 应助帖三天未予评分,代发部分金币以鼓励交流。 2017-06-30 03:53:43
洪秀萍: 金币+2 2017-06-30 08:44:07
编辑再找审稿人是稳重之举。只有一个审稿人审稿就接受的话的确会让人感觉不妥当。还是多找几个审稿人审稿,多听听几个人的意见有助于对稿件的修改和质量的提高。对此楼主不要有什么不适的感觉。
2楼2017-06-26 21:08:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 洪秀萍 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见