24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3811  |  回复: 11

18832614342

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] SCI,三天后被拒稿。工效学方向已有3人参与

第一次投SCI,三天后被拒稿。下面是编辑拒稿原因,请虫友分析原因,是否换个杂志投?还是?? requires fairly extensive technical editing是啥意思?。PS,我是工效学方面的。感谢!!
Papers submitted to Applied Ergonomics are pre-screened and assessed prior to sending them out to reviewers. We do this with a view to understanding whether there are any problems with the paper before this stage. This process also helps us to select appropriate reviewers if the paper passes the pre-screening. The issues and potential problems we assess include whether the paper is of sufficient scientific quality, has new or interesting technical content, is acceptably written in terms of the quality of language and production, and is within the scope of Applied Ergonomics.

In the case of your submission unfortunately there are some issues with the quality of the content of your paper as follows. The manuscripts requires fairly extensive technical editing. While this can be addressed, the main issue is that the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions. The study does not really generate significant new knowledge, and the most significant exposure (repetitive bending) is fairly well understood to be a risk factor for back injuries.

Therefore I am sorry to inform you that your paper has been rejected by the journal. I wish you very good luck in your research and publishing activities.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-06-17 07:00:55
18832614342: 金币+5 2017-06-26 16:02:55
The manuscripts requires fairly extensive technical editing.

稿件没有送审,因为学术价值不够,需要较大的编辑修改才能达到杂志社的要求,建议改投。
咱也是有组织的人了...
2楼2017-06-16 23:05:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peterflyer

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

peterflyer


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
创新性不足够,这是拒稿的主要原因。其次需要对稿件进行广泛的技术编辑,也就是说文章中存在很多语法、格式等问题需要润色和改正。建议在改投其他期刊前认真修改稿件。
6楼2017-06-17 10:49:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

insist8528

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-06-17 07:01:01
没有创新性,受众范围小

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2017-06-16 23:34:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

insist8528

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-06-17 07:01:09
不过这个期刊的好处是,拒绝的快。我有一篇也是,说公式太多,要偏应用的,好吧。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
4楼2017-06-16 23:35:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kmght

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

AP

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-06-17 07:01:15
致命伤是the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions
这句话基本就是判死刑了,改投吧

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Practice-makes-perfect
5楼2017-06-17 00:40:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

YueChuZeBei

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

要有创新性,这样受众范围才会变大

发自小木虫Android客户端
彼泽清陂,菡萏悠悠。
7楼2017-06-17 11:17:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

doctorzfj

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

the manuscript is too limited in scope
8楼2017-06-18 09:52:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
9楼2017-06-18 22:49:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

18832614342

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by kmght at 2017-06-17 00:40:12
致命伤是the manuscript is too limited in scope for the journal to consider given the small sample size and limited conditions
这句话基本就是判死刑了,改投吧
...

受教了,谢谢!
10楼2017-06-19 17:19:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 18832614342 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见