24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者susushishi将赠送您 20 个金币

susushishi

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1014.4
散金: 79
帖子: 220
在线: 35.6小时
虫号: 630106
注册: 2008-10-18
性别: MM
专业: 呼吸系统疾病其他科学问题

[求助] PLOS one大修，如何回复审稿意见

在PLOS one投稿后回复了大修
Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Partly

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No
其中这四个问题要回复吗？感觉2个审稿人也没特别的意见，如果要回复该怎么回啊？有没有投过此杂志的大神指点下？

回复此楼