| 查看: 5440 | 回复: 3 | |||
2808704855木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy审稿意见是啥意思 已有1人参与
|
|
最近 Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy的审稿意见回来了，不确定是审稿人具体的意思，想向各位大神求助一下，具体的审稿意见如下： -Reviewer 1 Dear Authors The study investigated the effect of xanthones from Gentianella acuta on I/R injury and tried to illuminate the mechanism of its cardiaprotective effect. I think the intensive study is well organized. The results are very promising. However, the manuscript could have been written better. it need english editing in minor extent. for examples; The first paragraph of the discussion is not convenient for discussion, it must be in the introduction section. page 17, line 3 "we investigated the effects of xanthones on cardiac function" this sentence is not convenient for discussion. page 4, line 8: "improve" can be "improved" page 10, line 8: instead of "this found", this finding is more appropriate. page 18, line 4, "the enzymes in intracellular" must be "the intracellular enzymes The color of Fig 2 is not distinctive if it is not color printing 这位审稿人的意思是让我小修一下，只要把如下几个错误改一下，还是他只是举了几个例子，其他的让我好好看看，改正此类错误。 Reviewer 2 this manuscript the authors describes the beneficial effects of xanthones from G.acuta against myocardial I/R injury in isolated rat hearts using Langendoff system. The data provided in the study largely demonstrates and supports the hypothesis proposed by the authors. However I have the following comments that can strengthen the manuscript. 1) Even though there are many parameters such as LDH assay, Bcl/Bax ratio indicate that G.acuta can prevent cellular apoptosis, there is a lack of mechanistic explanations to this observation. What is the signaling cascade involved in the effect of G.Acuta. Whether Bcl2/Bax is regulated via AKT, AMPK, ERK or is it a direct effect of G.acuta on mitochondria is not clear. 这位审稿人的意思是让我按他提的意见补一下实验，还是让我按他的意见好好改一下文中表达的意思。 杂志社一共给我60天的修改时间，是不是打算让我补实验啊? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有8人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
青基如何破局
已经有7人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有11人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有6人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有6人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有3人回复
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2017-05-04 23:52:32
|
这个简单呀。第一个审稿人的意见你按照他说的一改就好了。第二个审稿人的意思，我猜想你是做了蛋白表达的。他的意思是，你的东西缺少机理，让你确定具体的机制，你就按照他给你提的那几个，你可以选择一条通路补一下相关蛋白表达。因为你要补实验，所以给你两个月时间，很正常。好好修改，加油。我的也在修改，好艰难，一起加油吧 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2017-05-05 00:05:56
4楼2018-01-01 21:56:54
投票:
