| 查看: 1026 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者guangnian09将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
[求助]
恳求大神帮我具体分析一下这个审稿意见
|
||
|
审稿打分和意见如下： Ratings: 5=excellent, 4=good, 3=average, 2=poor, 1= unacceptable 1. Content Technical quality (1-5) : [ 4 ] Technical originality (1-5) : [ 4 ] 2. Presentation Overall format (1-5) : [ 3 ] Abstract (1-5) : [ 3 ] Figures and tables clarity (1-5) : [ 3 ] English (1-5) : [ 3 ] 3. Recommendation (tick one) Accept : [ ] Accept with minor revision : [ ] Accept with major revision : [ x ] Recommend for conference instead : [ x ] Reject : [ ] 4. Brief summary and further comments for the author(s) if any for improvement of the paper. (Use a separate sheet if necessary) The results are not significant enough for journal publication yet. Much more comprehensive results and evaluations are needed for journal publication. The authors have to further improve the technical writing and presentation of the paper. Additional suggestion: It would be desirable if the authors can cite some updated references and some open-access journals, which provide full article contents free of charge |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
26调剂 086003
已经有3人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有20人回复
-
271分求调剂学校
已经有11人回复
-
320分人工智能调剂
已经有6人回复
-
求调剂，一志愿南京航空航天大学 ，080500材料科学与工程学硕
已经有8人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
求材料调剂，一志愿郑州大学289分
已经有15人回复
-
26考研调剂0710 0860
已经有6人回复
-
282求调剂
已经有22人回复
-
283求调剂
已经有5人回复
jabez666
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2890.8
- 散金: 1077
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 870
- 在线: 79.2小时
- 虫号: 6324392
- 注册: 2017-04-15
- 专业: 数论
2楼2018-04-14 13:21:57
