| 查看: 2484 | 回复: 5 | ||
BBS-ECUST铜虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
RSC advances大修意见求助 已有1人参与
|
|
4月10号投了RSC advances，今天返回了审稿意见，两个审稿人，一个说创新性不足，拒稿；一个说创新性不足，但是给出了大修的意见，要求补个拉曼数据。编辑人给了个大修意见，说要在修改稿中写明创新点。有没有类似经验的同仁们给说下~~~ I have carefully evaluated your manuscript and the reviewers’ reports, and the reports indicate that major revisions are necessary. Both reviewers had concerns about the novelty of the work, and one reviewer recommended rejection on this basis. Thus, it is very important that you clearly outline what is new about this work in your revised version of the manuscript. Referee: 1 Recommendation: Reject Comments: In this manuscript, the authors suggested a simple and cost efficient way of producing hierarchical porous carbons via the direct carbonization of polymer. The authors used terephthalaldehyde and resorcinol as carbon precursors and metal chloride as reaction assistant. The authors found that zinc chloride acted as pore generator in the carbonization step to produce highly porous carbons, which results in the high specific capacitance as electrode for supercapacitors. However, as the authors are well aware of it, lots of papers regarding the effectiveness of zinc chloride as activation agent for producing porous carbons was previously reported. It is very hard for me to see the scientific originality of the present work over the previously reported papers. Even though the authors emphasized high cost performance of their synthetic method, I am not able to recommend the publication of this work at this journal due to the limited scientific advances. Additional Questions: Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: Yes Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: No Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: Yes Referee: 2 Recommendation: Major revisions Comments: Not sure what is novel here. There have been many studies of porous carbons prepared similarly. Authors need to make this clear, otherwise, it reads like a mini-review rather than a research paper. Do authors have any Raman spectroscopy data on samples that may lend insights into the degree of disorder of the various carbons? Additional Questions: Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: Yes Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: Yes Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: Yes |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
人工智能320调剂08工类还有机会吗
已经有14人回复
-
271求调剂
已经有27人回复
-
考研求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
085408光电信息工程专硕355一志愿长春光机所调剂
已经有3人回复
-
071000生物学，一志愿深圳大学296分，求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
化工学硕 285求调剂
已经有28人回复
-
有没有学校材料专业收跨调(一志愿085410)
已经有12人回复
-
0854调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿085802 323分求调剂
已经有14人回复
Chem. Albert
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 365 (硕士)
- 金币: 10672.2
- 散金: 220
- 红花: 71
- 帖子: 1529
- 在线: 301.7小时
- 虫号: 3936158
- 注册: 2015-06-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
2楼2017-04-24 17:01:19
BBS-ECUST
铜虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1590.4
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 46
- 在线: 202.1小时
- 虫号: 2026783
- 注册: 2012-09-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光谱分析
3楼2017-04-24 17:09:34
Chem. Albert
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 365 (硕士)
- 金币: 10672.2
- 散金: 220
- 红花: 71
- 帖子: 1529
- 在线: 301.7小时
- 虫号: 3936158
- 注册: 2015-06-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
4楼2017-04-24 17:23:00
小丑鱼爱读书
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2052.1
- 散金: 70
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 784
- 在线: 238.7小时
- 虫号: 2589310
- 注册: 2013-08-09
- 专业: 聚合物共混与复合材料
5楼2017-04-25 08:45:25
zhanhuang311
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 38 (小学生)
- 金币: 1278.2
- 散金: 1767
- 红花: 37
- 帖子: 1613
- 在线: 497小时
- 虫号: 3649432
- 注册: 2015-01-16
- 专业: 无机非金属材料
6楼2017-07-20 19:07:57
