24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wszhancj将赠送您 20 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wszhancj

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 127.9
散金: 126
帖子: 36
在线: 18小时
虫号: 3071215
注册: 2014-03-19
性别: GG
专业: 自动化

[求助] IECR在peer review前被拒，虫友们帮忙看看如何下一步已有1人参与

There are several issues with this manuscript. First, the use-of-English needs to be improved substantially, but second, and most importantly, the material appears to be a minor and not very significant modification to existing methodologies. The significance of the contribution therefore appears to be marginal at best. If the authors believe that the contribution is significant, then they need to do the following: first improve the use-of-English and then rewrite the paper in such a way that the significance of the contribution is presented convincingly. Otherwise, they should consider submitting to another journal that caters to papers that might be technically correct but whose contributions are marginal and incremental.
Our increasing number of submissions has led us to become more selective regarding the manuscripts we send for peer review. Not all manuscripts that report solid applied chemistry/chemical engineering research can be forwarded to reviewers. We are most interested in manuscripts that clearly present new and novel ideas of interest to a general readership. The field of Process Systems Engineering is already a crowded one. To be published in I&EC Research, a paper in this area would need to offer groundbreaking advances of interest to a general applied chemistry/chemical engineering audience rather than an advance largely of interest to other specialists in the same field. Some interesting contributions that might have been accepted a few years ago must now be declined because they lack the novelty that we desire for articles in I&EC Research. I regret that the present manuscript does not meet the stringent requirements for acceptance and publication in I&EC Research. We hope that this rapid decision will facilitate the publication of your work in a more appropriate venue.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider this work for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. We look forward to receiving future submissions from you.
第一次投稿，文章创新性一般，这种编辑回复不知道是标准回复还是说哪个地方非常不足需要改进，请大家帮忙看看

回复此楼