| ²é¿´: 640 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß²»ÈçÐëô§½«ÔùËÍÄú 200 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
²»ÈçÐëô§Ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
С˶һö£¬Ê×´ÎͶӢÎÄÆÚ¿¯£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼û²»ÖªÔõô´¦Àí£¬Íû¸øµã½¨Ò飬лл£¡
|
|
|
15) The authors should consider keeping the scale for the y-axis consistent in Figures 12 and 13 in order to allow for a clearer comparison of the results presented in these figures. 16) When comparing the results in Figures 16 to 18, please explain why the stains in some double hole tunnels are greater than those observed int he single hole tunnel for the same excitation, while the opposite trend is observed in other figures. ÕâÇ°Ãæ¶¼ÊÇר¼Ò¸øµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÏÂÃæÓÖ¸øÁËAdditional Questions£¬ÕâÔõô´¦Àí£¬ÎÒÓ¦¸ÃÔõÑù»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¿¶øÇÒÏÂÃæ¸øµÄÓеÄÊǺÍר¼ÒÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÒ»ÑùµÄ£¬µ«Ò²Óв»Ò»ÑùµÄ¡£Contribution:£¬Non-Commercial:£¬Please elaborate if necessary: £¬A- Accept as isÕⶼʲôÒâ˼£¬Òª×öʲô£¿¡£±¾ÈËС˶һö£¬Ê×´ÎͶӢÎÄ£¬Ï£Íû´óÉñÃǸøµã½¨Ò飬лл£¡ Additional Questions: 1. Contribution: Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community? : M - Mandatory Revisions Please elaborate if necessary: The paper has the potential to make contributions to the permanent literature of the technical community. However, in its current form the paper is too generic and does not add to the technical literature. The authors are advised to explore their results in detail and explain the mechanisms behind the results obtained as opposed to stating that the variations are a product of the variations in the models examined as the models were developed to study the differences. 2. Non-Commercial: Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner? : A- Accept as is Please elaborate if necessary: 3. Communication: Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development? : M - Mandatory Revisions Please elaborate if necessary: The English language within the paper requires substantial editing. There are a number of run-on sentences which attempt to present several ideas in the structure of a single sentence making the paper difficult to follow at times. The authors are advised to have the paper reviewed and edited by an individual with excellent technical writing skills. 4. Not Previously Published: It is important that the substance of the paper shall not have been published elsewhere unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement? : A- Accept as is Please elaborate if necessary: |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì´ó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¨085600£©×Ü·Ö338
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çó²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ£¬080502£¬354·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ªÁÖ´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧ˶321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085410È˹¤ÖÇÄÜר˶317Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0854¶¼¿ÉÒÔ£©
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥