| 查看: 694 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者不如须臾将赠送您 200 个金币 | ||
[求助]
小硕一枚，首次投英文期刊，审稿意见不知怎么处理，望给点建议，谢谢！
|
||
|
15) The authors should consider keeping the scale for the y-axis consistent in Figures 12 and 13 in order to allow for a clearer comparison of the results presented in these figures. 16) When comparing the results in Figures 16 to 18, please explain why the stains in some double hole tunnels are greater than those observed int he single hole tunnel for the same excitation, while the opposite trend is observed in other figures. 这前面都是专家给的审稿意见，下面又给了Additional Questions，这怎么处理，我应该怎样回复审稿意见？而且下面给的有的是和专家审稿意见一样的，但也有不一样的。Contribution:，Non-Commercial:，Please elaborate if necessary: ，A- Accept as is这都什么意思，要做什么？。本人小硕一枚，首次投英文，希望大神们给点建议，谢谢！ Additional Questions: 1. Contribution: Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community? : M - Mandatory Revisions Please elaborate if necessary: The paper has the potential to make contributions to the permanent literature of the technical community. However, in its current form the paper is too generic and does not add to the technical literature. The authors are advised to explore their results in detail and explain the mechanisms behind the results obtained as opposed to stating that the variations are a product of the variations in the models examined as the models were developed to study the differences. 2. Non-Commercial: Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner? : A- Accept as is Please elaborate if necessary: 3. Communication: Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development? : M - Mandatory Revisions Please elaborate if necessary: The English language within the paper requires substantial editing. There are a number of run-on sentences which attempt to present several ideas in the structure of a single sentence making the paper difficult to follow at times. The authors are advised to have the paper reviewed and edited by an individual with excellent technical writing skills. 4. Not Previously Published: It is important that the substance of the paper shall not have been published elsewhere unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement? : A- Accept as is Please elaborate if necessary: |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金啊基金
已经有3人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有15人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有10人回复
-
言之凿凿，明天官网会通知放榜？
已经有17人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有17人回复
-
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有23人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有22人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有12人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有12人回复
40