24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 4950  |  回复: 17
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者沉默的角落将赠送您 7 个金币

沉默的角落

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] Journal of Physics D投稿被拒已有4人参与

前两天刚收到审稿意见,总共有两个审稿人,第一个审稿人给的意见是小修;第二个审稿人(身份是"Editorial Board Member",编委?),不同意接受,建议拒稿子,也给了不少审稿意见,不过都是批评性质的,好好的把我的文章喷了一顿。。。编辑给的决定是“reject”。

现在问题是,老师让我按照两位审稿人(尤其是第二个审稿人)的意见认真修改,修改之后再重投该期刊。

可是我看到要求拒稿的第二个审稿人是该期刊的编委,不知道重投后再次被拒的可能性大不大?

还请有相关经验的木虫们给点建议。。。

以下是编辑邮件回复的部分内容及两位审稿人的审稿意见:

We regret to inform you that the referee(s) have recommended that your article should not be published in the journal, for the reasons given in the reports. Your manuscript has therefore been withdrawn from consideration.

We would like to thank you for your interest in Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics.

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)
Dear editor and authors,
This is a paper provides a thorough experimental analysis of the XXX made at room temperature with different molar ratio and solution. I hope it can be published finally. However, there are a few minor things addressed here.
1.        Please double check the grammar before publication.  For example, in page 11 of 23, line 26 “This is because…”   
2.        Add reference in the introduction part, such as page 2 pf 23, line 40 “Our results suggest that the … under the same condition [add references please]
3.        Could the authors explain why the crystallite size increase with increasing PH? In page 6.
4.        Please be aware of the significant numbers.  Could the authors mentioned what software they use on the TEM image measurements? It is possible to be accurate to 0.325 nm? Also the author mentioned the crystallite size approx.2.52 nm? How many digitals is important?
5.        Page 14: Is the negative external bias (or the positive bias) the same like reverse bias in a diode to increases electric field?
Best wishes,


Referee: 2 (Editorial Board Member)

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)
The authors report the aqueous phase synthesis (either at room temperature or at 90°C) of XXX and studied the time-resolved carriers transport in these materials. The paper reports standard data for the known material. From my opinion, the manuscript does not have sufficient scientific impact to appeal to a broad readership and I do not recommend its publication in the Journal of Physics D.
- the introduction should be rewritten. The topic of this manuscript is poorly discussed in the context of literature.
- the experimental section must be clarified and synthetic protocols clearly described.
- paragraph 3.1 reports results already well documented in the literature for XXX. The results obtained are not appropriately described in the context of literature. For example, the shift observed in XRD patterns does not originate from the thiols function of the cysteine ligand as described by the authors page 6 but from the ligand decomposition followed by the incorporation of sulfide ions in the ZnSe lattice.
- the results and discussion section should be focused on the results described in paragraph 3.2. The advances made should be highlighted by the authors.
- the language must be improved.@Monash2011
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

沉默的角落

新虫 (正式写手)

另外吐槽一句,审了3个月才给我审稿意见,还是拒稿,丫的
2楼2017-03-03 10:42:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smallgarden

新虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
沉默的角落(lotuscsx代发): 金币+1, 应助帖三天未予评分,代发部分金币以鼓励交流。 2017-07-13 07:19:10
我估计楼主的论文是一篇化学论文,化学成分大于物理成分,和期刊宗旨不吻合。编辑不太想收。
5楼2017-03-03 11:26:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

沉默的角落

新虫 (正式写手)

另外也不知道被第二个编委审稿人喷的这么惨,是不是因为我cover letter里把期刊名写错的原因。。。
3楼2017-03-03 10:45:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可怜的小叔子

禁虫 (正式写手)


yanhualover: 金币+1, 谢谢交流 2017-03-03 11:02:52
本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2017-03-03 11:00:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

glin08

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不建议重投,编委里面有人拒搞,这个再接收的可能性不大,建议好好改改换投,祝好运。

发自小木虫Android客户端
一个很平凡的人,在纭纭众生里,一个你决不会一眼就认出的人。
6楼2017-03-03 11:52:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shan_yin

木虫 (正式写手)


沉默的角落(lotuscsx代发): 金币+1, 应助帖三天未予评分,代发部分金币以鼓励交流。 2017-07-13 07:19:20
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 沉默的角落 at 2017-03-03 10:42:42
另外吐槽一句,审了3个月才给我审稿意见,还是拒稿,丫的

楼主,别人给了具体的意见你就应该感激。君不见三个月不给意见然后再拒搞的多的是,我自己就遇到了两次

发自小木虫Android客户端
7楼2017-03-03 13:19:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
8楼2017-03-03 13:25:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

material155

木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
沉默的角落(lotuscsx代发): 金币+1, 应助帖三天未予评分,代发部分金币以鼓励交流。 2017-07-13 07:19:28
Referee: 2 (Editorial Board Member)
"From my opinion, the manuscript does not have sufficient scientific impact to appeal to a broad readership and I do not recommend its publication in the Journal of Physics D."

编委拒搞,再接收的可能性不大,建议改投其他期刊。
9楼2017-03-03 17:27:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (小有名气)

本帖仅楼主可见
10楼2017-03-03 17:52:46
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 沉默的角落 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见