| ²é¿´: 423 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßcquphy½«ÔùËÍÄú 50 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
cquphyгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
һƪÆÏÌÑÌÇ´«¸ÐÆ÷ÎÄÕµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û
|
|
|
×î½üͶÁËһƪÆÏÌÑÌÇ´«¸ÐÆ÷µÄÎÄÕ£¬Éó¸åÈ˸ø¼¸¸öÒâ¼û£¬µ«ÊDz»Ì«Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ˼£º 1¡¢Application of the sensor in real sample must be added into the text. And also, the results should be compared with the reference method. µÚÒ»¾äÊÇ˵Ôö¼Óʵ¼ÊÑùÆ·²âÊÔ£¬µ«Êǵڶþ¾äÊÇÒª¸úÎÄÏ׶ԱȻ¹ÊÇʲô£¿ 2¡¢ I was surprised to see that the method, according to the manuscript (discussion/conclusion), has no major limitations. Is this correct? If not, please specify in the manuscript. ËûÕâÀï˵ÎҵIJâÊÔ·½·¨ÓÐÎÊÌâÂ𣿠3¡¢Why is the method selective for glucose? The authors should comment on this selectivity in the main text. 4¡¢The significant numbers in Fig.5c is too many. Õâ¸öÎÊÌâÊÇÏë˵ÎÒͼ5cµÄµãÌ«¶àÁËÂ𣿠|
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£´ó0705Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
306·Ö²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
324Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶283Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤306·ÖÕÒµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
085600£¬321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼ÊõÇóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öк£Ñó319
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10