24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者我是老大185将赠送您 15 个金币

我是老大185

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 106.5
散金: 35
帖子: 74
在线: 27.8小时
虫号: 2620700
注册: 2013-08-28
性别: GG
专业: 药物代谢与药物动力学

[求助] 投稿民族药理学，编辑回信，不太明白，请指导已有1人参与

各位专家，请教一下，这个是本人第一投稿的SCI论文，投到了民族药理学（Journal Of Ethnopharmacology），是一篇主要注射剂药理类的文章，刚投出去，编辑回复了以下内容：
Please consult these as it will help you to see what criteria we are using for our first screening. I have read your paper but it is not yet acceptable as it does not meet the criteria as described in the “Rules of 5”. My decision is based on not meeting the following criteria:

A proper chemical profile (e.g. TLC, HPLC, GC, MS or NMR) is welcomed in all studies on medicinal plants. In case of well known medicinal plants with fully known active compounds, and which can be found in a pharmacopeia, the content of these active compounds should be determined. In case of industrial products, full details on the batch number, contents, method of extraction and preparation of the final formulation, including quality control data must be made available.
Full botanical plant names, including authorities, must be mentioned. Please check also if your plant name corresponds to the latest revision in “The Plant List” ().

不太明白说的什么，想请教一下，编辑主要需要我补充哪些内容，还有就是，这些补充的内容需要放到手稿里面吗？还是单独建个WORD？还有就是这句话“My decision is based on not meeting the following criteria:”，意思是不是让我根据以下的意见进行修改

回复此楼