| 查看: 2260 | 回复: 0 | ||
小李茂刚新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
响应面实验结果，麻烦哪位大神帮我仔细分析一下，麻烦谢谢！
|
|
Use your mouse to right click on individual cells for definitions. Response 1 转化率 ANOVA for Response Surface Quadratic Model Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III] Sum of Mean F p-value Source Squares df Square Value Prob > F Model 0.81 9 0.090 401.47 < 0.0001 significant A-浓度 0.056 1 0.056 251.16 < 0.0001 B-液固比 0.62 1 0.62 2771.53 < 0.0001 C-温度 4.599E-003 1 4.599E-003 20.62 0.0027 AB 0.027 1 0.027 119.37 < 0.0001 AC 1.692E-004 1 1.692E-004 0.76 0.4126 BC 4.260E-003 1 4.260E-003 19.10 0.0033 A^2 6.821E-004 1 6.821E-004 3.06 0.1238 B^2 0.094 1 0.094 421.55 < 0.0001 C^2 3.538E-003 1 3.538E-003 15.86 0.0053 Residual 1.561E-003 7 2.230E-004 Lack of Fit 1.132E-003 3 3.772E-004 3.51 0.1282 not significant Pure Error 4.297E-004 4 1.074E-004 Cor Total 0.81 16 The Model F-value of 401.47 implies the model is significant. There is only a 0.01% chance that a "Model F-Value" this large could occur due to noise. Values of "Prob > F" less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant. In this case A, B, C, AB, BC, B++2+-, C++2+- are significant model terms. Values greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant. If there are many insignificant model terms (not counting those required to support hierarchy), model reduction may improve your model. The "Lack of Fit F-value" of 3.51 implies the Lack of Fit is not significant relative to the pure error. There is a 12.82% chance that a "Lack of Fit F-value" this large could occur due to noise. Non-significant lack of fit is good -- we want the model to fit. Std. Dev. 0.015 R-Squared 0.9981 Mean 0.79 Adj R-Squared 0.9956 C.V. % 1.90 Pred R-Squared 0.9767 PRESS 0.019 Adeq Precision 65.140 The "Pred R-Squared" of 0.9767 is in reasonable agreement with the "Adj R-Squared" of 0.9956. "Adeq Precision" measures the signal to noise ratio. A ratio greater than 4 is desirable. Your ratio of 65.140 indicates an adequate signal. This model can be used to navigate the design space. Coefficient Standard 95% CI 95% CI Factor Estimate df Error Low High VIF Intercept 0.84 1 6.679E-003 0.82 0.85 A-浓度 0.084 1 5.280E-003 0.071 0.096 1.00 B-液固比 0.28 1 5.280E-003 0.27 0.29 1.00 C-温度 -0.024 1 5.280E-003 -0.036 -0.011 1.00 AB -0.082 1 7.467E-003 -0.099 -0.064 1.00 AC 6.505E-003 1 7.467E-003 -0.011 0.024 1.00 BC 0.033 1 7.467E-003 0.015 0.050 1.00 A^2 0.013 1 7.278E-003 -4.482E-003 0.030 1.01 B^2 -0.15 1 7.278E-003 -0.17 -0.13 1.01 C^2 0.029 1 7.278E-003 0.012 0.046 1.01 Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors: 转化率 = +0.84 +0.084 * A +0.28 * B -0.024 * C -0.082 * A * B +6.505E-003 * A * C +0.033 * B * C +0.013 * A^2 -0.15 * B^2 +0.029 * C^2 Final Equation in Terms of Actual Factors: 转化率 = +0.46813 -0.016262 * 浓度 +0.33861 * 液固比 -0.019780 * 温度 -5.09902E-003 * 浓度 * 液固比 +8.13091E-005 * 浓度 * 温度 +4.07953E-004 * 液固比 * 温度 +7.95503E-004 * 浓度^2 -9.33946E-003 * 液固比^2 +7.24667E-005 * 温度^2 The Diagnostics Case Statistics Report has been moved to the Diagnostics Node. In the Diagnostics Node, Select Case Statistics from the View Menu. Proceed to Diagnostic Plots (the next icon in progression). Be sure to look at the: 1) Normal probability plot of the studentized residuals to check for normality of residuals. 2) Studentized residuals versus predicted values to check for constant error. 3) Externally Studentized Residuals to look for outliers, i.e., influential values. 4) Box-Cox plot for power transformations. If all the model statistics and diagnostic plots are OK, finish up with the Model Graphs icon.@月只蓝@beefly |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
法国博士后职位
已经有0人回复
-
重庆交大26年硕士生招生拟调剂通知已出！欢迎加入机器视觉与3D光学成像课题组。
已经有0人回复
-
物理学I论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有64人回复
-
**
已经有1人回复
-
0702一志愿吉大B区求调剂 本科期间发表一篇Sci
已经有3人回复
-
基底STO,薄膜SRO，XRD里面的振荡，是laue震荡还是kiessig振荡? 怎么判断？
已经有2人回复
-
B区学生调剂-兰州交通大学材料科学与工程学院
已经有8人回复
-
山西大同大学物理学专业还有调剂名额，欢迎调剂！
已经有9人回复
-
桂林理工大学物理学专业招收调剂
已经有10人回复
-
VASP 的一组 GPU / CPU 基准测试记录
已经有0人回复
