| 查看: 607 | 回复: 1 | |||
yanli199208新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
解蛋白质结构出现pseudo-translation NCS 怎么办
|
| 解结构时出现了pseudo-translation NCS， 已有partial model, 但是Rfree and R work 非常高，大概都在0.4左右，以前没有遇到类似问题，求大神帮忙！！！感谢！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有13人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有10人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有13人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有8人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有17人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有19人回复
-
【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士
已经有8人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有4人回复
闲来小译
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1324.8
- 散金: 35
- 红花: 19
- 帖子: 661
- 在线: 231.6小时
- 虫号: 3861458
- 注册: 2015-05-11
- 专业: 生物大分子结构与功能
|
What is pseudo-translation? Pseudo-translation means that two NCS-related molecules are in the same (or similar) orientation. In that case, the Patterson function displays a peak corresponding to the relative displacement of these molecules. From a posting by Herman Schreuder: It could also be illuminating to look at what is behind the off-origin peak: it means that you have one molecule (say A) at (0.0.0) and one molecule (say B) at (0,0.5,0.5) which are very similar, but not identical. If they were identical, your off-origin peak would be crystallographic and an origin peak. If you look at the relative phases, the phase of molecule A would be 2pi(h*0+k*0+l*0)=0 whereas the relative phase of molecule B would be 2pi(h*0+0.5*k+0.5*l)=pi(k+l). The total diffraction is then: Ftotal = FA (cos(0) + isin(0)) + FB (cos(pi(k+l) + isin(k+l)). For k+l even pi(k+l)= 0 or 2pi and Ftotal = FA (1 + 0) + FB ( 1 + 0) = FA + FB (strong reflections) For k+l odd pi(k+l)= pi and Ftotal = FA (1 + 0) + FB (-1 + 0) = FA - FB (weak reflections, zero if FA=FB) This means, you could also discard all k+l reflections by reprocessing the data in the smaller unit cell and run molrep with that data. You will have to search for only one molecule and the final density will be the sum of molecules A and B. This may give you hints how the packing of your larger unit cell may look like. As I said before, these almost crystallographic NCS is extremely trickey and can easily fool automatic programs and crystallographers alike. Solving the structure 1) obtain the pseudo-translation vector (PST) from sfcheck/phenix.xtriage/molrep 2) generate a model (2 molecules in 1 pdb file) consisting of one molecule at (0,0,0) and one shifted by the PST in the orientation you found by mol rep and run molecular replacement with that model (note: the molrep program does all of this internally) 3) if that fails, reprocess the data in P1 and try step 2 in all possible spacegroups, including those with lower symmetry (like P1 itself) 网上查的，不知道靠谱不靠谱 |
2楼2017-02-11 04:56:03