| ²é¿´: 732 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
²ÊºçÌǵÄÃØÃÜгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
Ôõô·Òë°¡ÇóÖú£¬JBT-101ÊÇʲôÇó¸æÖª
|
|
abstract Ajulemic acid, a side-chain analog of D8 -THC-11-oic acid, was designed as a potent therapeutic agent free of the psychotropic adverse effects typical of most cannabinoids. Subsequent studies of ajulemic acid have yielded widely divergent findings on the occurrence of these adverse effects. To help resolve these discrepancies, we have prepared highly purified ajulemic acid using a different synthetic method than previously reported in the literature and compared its cannabinoid receptor binding constants with those obtained using several other preparations from different sources. Whereas CB2 binding did not vary greatly among all of the samples, the CB1 binding showed a wide range of affinities. The highly purified product (JBT-101) reported here had the weakest affinity for CB1 while the original preparation (HU-239) showed the strongest affinity for CB1. The CB1/CB2 ratio of affinities was 12.3 for JBT-101 whereas that for HU-239 was 0.19, a 65-fold difference. Functional responses such as catalepsy and hypothermia using JBT-101 versus HU-239 displayed reduced CB1 activity in keeping with the receptor binding data. Thus, earlier conclusions on the limited therapeutic index for ajulemic acid need to be reconsidered in the light of the data now obtained using JBT-101. ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
ϵͳ²é²»µ½
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓÐÈÔûÊÕµ½ÐÅÏ¢µÄ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Â鷳ר¼ÒÃÇ¿´¿´ÆÀίÃǵÄÒâ¼û£¨F¿ÚÃæÉÏ£©
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
2026ÄêÒ¶ÆóËï»ù½ð
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÊºçÌǵÄÃØÃÜ
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 375.3
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 65
- ÔÚÏß: 6.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 4221971
- ×¢²á: 2015-11-16
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ò©Îï·ÖÎö
|
abstract Ajulemic acid, a side-chain analog of D8 -THC-11-oic acid, was designed as a potent therapeutic agent free of the psychotropic adverse effects typical of most cannabinoids. Subsequent studies of ajulemic acid have yielded widely divergent findings on the occurrence of these adverse effects. To help resolve these discrepancies, we have prepared highly purified ajulemic acid using a different synthetic method than previously reported in the literature and compared its cannabinoid receptor binding constants with those obtained using several other preparations from different sources. Whereas CB2 binding did not vary greatly among all of the samples, the CB1 binding showed a wide range of affinities. The highly purified product (JBT-101) reported here had the weakest affinity for CB1 while the original preparation (HU-239) showed the strongest affinity for CB1. The CB1/CB2 ratio of affinities was 12.3 for JBT-101 whereas that for HU-239 was 0.19, a 65-fold difference. Functional responses such as catalepsy and hypothermia using JBT-101 versus HU-239 displayed reduced CB1 activity in keeping with the receptor binding data. Thus, earlier conclusions on the limited therapeutic index for ajulemic acid need to be reconsidered in the light of the data now obtained using JBT-101. ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
2Â¥2017-02-07 10:27:37









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥