²é¿´: 732  |  »Ø¸´: 1

²ÊºçÌǵÄÃØÃÜ

гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

[½»Á÷] Ôõô·­Òë°¡ÇóÖú£¬JBT-101ÊÇʲôÇó¸æÖª

abstract
Ajulemic acid, a side-chain analog of D8
-THC-11-oic acid, was designed as a potent therapeutic agent free
of the psychotropic adverse effects typical of most cannabinoids. Subsequent studies of ajulemic acid
have yielded widely divergent findings on the occurrence of these adverse effects. To help resolve these
discrepancies, we have prepared highly purified ajulemic acid using a different synthetic method than
previously reported in the literature and compared its cannabinoid receptor binding constants with those
obtained using several other preparations from different sources. Whereas CB2 binding did not vary
greatly among all of the samples, the CB1 binding showed a wide range of affinities. The highly purified
product (JBT-101) reported here had the weakest affinity for CB1 while the original preparation (HU-239)
showed the strongest affinity for CB1. The CB1/CB2 ratio of affinities was 12.3 for JBT-101 whereas that
for HU-239 was 0.19, a 65-fold difference. Functional responses such as catalepsy and hypothermia using
JBT-101 versus HU-239 displayed reduced CB1 activity in keeping with the receptor binding data. Thus,
earlier conclusions on the limited therapeutic index for ajulemic acid need to be reconsidered in the light
of the data now obtained using JBT-101.

·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

²ÊºçÌǵÄÃØÃÜ

гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

abstract
Ajulemic acid, a side-chain analog of D8
-THC-11-oic acid, was designed as a potent therapeutic agent free
of the psychotropic adverse effects typical of most cannabinoids. Subsequent studies of ajulemic acid
have yielded widely divergent findings on the occurrence of these adverse effects. To help resolve these
discrepancies, we have prepared highly purified ajulemic acid using a different synthetic method than
previously reported in the literature and compared its cannabinoid receptor binding constants with those
obtained using several other preparations from different sources. Whereas CB2 binding did not vary
greatly among all of the samples, the CB1 binding showed a wide range of affinities. The highly purified
product (JBT-101) reported here had the weakest affinity for CB1 while the original preparation (HU-239)
showed the strongest affinity for CB1. The CB1/CB2 ratio of affinities was 12.3 for JBT-101 whereas that
for HU-239 was 0.19, a 65-fold difference. Functional responses such as catalepsy and hypothermia using
JBT-101 versus HU-239 displayed reduced CB1 activity in keeping with the receptor binding data. Thus,
earlier conclusions on the limited therapeutic index for ajulemic acid need to be reconsidered in the light
of the data now obtained using JBT-101.

·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë
2Â¥2017-02-07 10:27:37
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ ²ÊºçÌǵÄÃØÃÜ µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶Ó­ÌÖÂÛ (½ð±Ò+15) +13 ÇçÌì¼ÓÓÍ 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-28 18:36 by huagongfeihu
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ϵͳ²é²»µ½ +11 ¶­°Ëǧ 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] »ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by »ðÐdz¬ÈËxi
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] Â鷳ר¼ÒÃÇ¿´¿´ÆÀίÃǵÄÒâ¼û£¨F¿ÚÃæÉÏ£© +4 gdd2018 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-28 14:22 by jklily
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] 2026ÄêÒ¶ÆóËï»ù½ð +3 bud_bud 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-28 11:53 by bud_bud
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÄÄλ¸ßÈËÖÐÁË£¬°Ñ²éѯµ½µÄ½ØÍ¼Ìù³öÀ´ÈÃÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÈÃÎÒ³¤³¤¼ûʶ +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] »ù½ðδÖУ¬ÕâÖÖ´ð¸´ÊÇÄ£°åÂ𣿠+5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¿´°åÉÏÕâô¶àÖеģ¬ÓеãÏñ50ÈËȺÀï49¸öÈ˶¼ÊÇÆ­×ÓµÄÄÇÖָоõ¡­¡­ +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] Ôõô¿´Çà»ùÖÐÁËûÓа¡ +5 Ò¶¾Å΢ 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[ÎÄѧ·¼²ÝÔ°] ÃÎÏë +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] 2026Äê8ÔÂ25ÈÕ¹ú×ÔÈ»·Å°ñǰͻȻÊÕµ½ÁÐÈëÆÀÉóר¼ÒÓʼþ£¬ÓйØÏµÂ𣿠+25 ľˮ˼¶¹ 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] Ϊʲô¹ú×ÔÈ»²»ÄÜÖ±½Ó¹«²¼ +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¹ú¼ÊºÏ×÷¿É²éÁË£¬ÖÐÁËÃæÉÏ (EPI+1)(½ð±Ò+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¹úºÏ¿É²éÁË +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ½ñÌìÎñί»á¿ªÍêÁË£¬Ã÷Ìì³ö½á¹ûÂð +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[Ö°³¡ÈËÉú] ѧÉúײ¼û¸¨µ¼Ô±ËÍÍâÂô£¬µÚ¶þÌìÈ«°à¶¼³ÁĬÁË +3 ¾¨ÓãÈÚ½ð_Õã½­_É 2026-08-22 3/150 2026-08-26 09:01 by zzuzxg
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¹úºÏÏÖÔڲ鲻µ½ÁËÂ𣿠+10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÔÚ¼á±ù»¹¸Ç×ű±º£µÄʱºò£¬ÎÒ¿´µ½ÁËÅ­·ÅµÄ÷»¨¡£ (½ð±Ò+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ijЩ»ú¹¹£¬ÒÔЧÂʵÍΪÈÙ£¬ÒÔЧÂʵÍ×÷Ϊ´æÔڸР+9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ûÓÐÈκÎÏûÏ¢-ÊDz»ÊǾÍÁ¹ÁË +9 ͼÀ²Í¼À² 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by ÄϺ£Ð¡¸ç
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û