| 查看: 2554 | 回复: 54 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
计算类审稿意见
|
|||
|
只有一个审稿人的意见，如下。本文用的是MS中dmol3模块，外审专家提到自旋耦合，但是Ms中没有（高斯有自旋耦合），不知道解释好？还有这样的意见严重吗？在此先感谢大家！祝大家新年好！多发paper，事事顺心！ Reviewer #2: The paper reports results of a theoretical study of the structural, energetic, and electronic properties of the clusters with from 2 to 14 atom pairs. The calculations were carried through using parameter-free density-functional methods in combination with molecular-dynamics simulations. I have no reason for doubting the results or the study, and also the presentation is largely adequate. Nevertheless, I have some issues that I think the authors must consider: 1. The motivation behind the work is not very clear. Rather, the reader gets the feeling that the study was carried through because nobody else has done so, and then the authors are hoping that someone some day will find the work interesting and/or relevant. The authors must specify what they are learning from the study. 2. I think that the authors do not include spin-orbit couplings in the calculations, although for Pb this may be a not very accurate approximation. Please rationalize this decision and discuss what consequences this has for the accuracy of the calculated IP and EA values. 3. Similarly, do the authors include spin polarization? If not, why not? And then again, which consequences has this on the calculated IP and EA values? Discuss in manuscript. 4. The authors seem to have a huge set of meta-stable structures for each stoichiometry. It would be useful if they would also report the total-energy differences between the most stable and the 2nd-most stable structure for each stoichiometry. This would give information on stability, too. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有6人回复
-
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有6人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有14人回复
-
师弟论文见刊大半年才想起来申请专利，还能抢救一下吗？
已经有4人回复
-
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变？做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求大神~审稿意见出现statistical error (RMSE, SSE, X2)这是什么东西？
已经有0人回复
- 麻烦大家帮忙看看这个审稿人什么意思（关于数据分析和”化学计量系数？“）
已经有5人回复
- 请问信息类有哪些审稿比较快、容易中的期刊，cscd核心的
已经有7人回复
- 求助国外计算机或仪器仪表类的SCI、EI期刊
已经有4人回复
- 我的第一篇SCI论文，历时1111天【计算机类--IJSEKE】
已经有42人回复
- 推荐一个审稿超快的计算机期刊
已经有8人回复
- 请问计算机研究与发展审稿意见出来后多久可以有结果？麻烦有经验的人解答
已经有23人回复
- 一篇理论计算类communication angew被拒求推荐杂志
已经有1人回复
- 审稿意见下来，求达人们帮忙分析一下
已经有10人回复
- 【求助】大家能推荐一个不要审稿费，但审稿负责，能给出较好审稿意见的计算机类期刊吗
已经有6人回复
- 跪求 审稿意见
已经有1人回复
- 我的第一篇SCI（计算机，信息类）接收的经历
已经有106人回复
39楼2017-02-02 10:58:17
简单回复
hydzp3楼
2017-02-02 08:48
回复
18213818611(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
l6512404楼
2017-02-02 08:50
回复
18213818611(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
xj123xj5楼
2017-02-02 08:50
回复
大懒虫11号8楼
2017-02-02 08:55
回复
yuekong10楼
2017-02-02 09:01
回复
18213818611(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
王惠11楼
2017-02-02 09:12
回复
18213818611(金币+1): 谢谢参与
m 发自小木虫IOS客户端
吸血人狼城12楼
2017-02-02 09:13
回复
熙梓宝宝13楼
2017-02-02 09:16
回复