24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3033  |  回复: 5

han.bw

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] IEEE Trans. Smart Gid 一审意见 录用几率大吗?已有2人参与

After careful review we have determined that your paper might be of interest for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, after revisions, if those revisions fully and properly address the concerns of the reviewers. The comments from the reviewers appearing below may include specific revisions that are mandatory and other changes suggested. You may have to make broader changes if necessary based on general comments provided by the reviewers.

I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance.

It is, rather, a recognition by our reviewers and editors that your paper merits some interest. The reviewers of the original draft will be approached to assess the revised manuscript; at the discretion of the editor, additional reviewers may be included.

Please submit your revised paper within 60 days of receiving this letter.  After 60 days the revision will expire and you will need to submit your manuscript as a new paper submission.

We encourage you to include an explanation of how you responded to the comments by the reviewers to help expedite our review.

Please include this explanation in the space provided for "response to reviewers" and "response to editor" when you upload the revision.

Please note that you should submit your revised paper following the latest author's guidelines (We have had direct author upload since January 7, 2002). See the Author's Kit on:

www.ieee.org/organizations/society/power/subpages/authors.html

Also, directions are contained at the end of this email.


WE ARE AUTOMATICALLY INFORMED WHEN YOU UPLOAD YOUR REVISION AND RESPONSES SO PLEASE DO NOT SEND EMAIL TO ME THAT YOU SUBMITTED YOUR PAPER, AND PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME YOUR PAPER AS EMAIL ATTACHMENT.

Sincerely,
Dr. Jianhui Wang
Editor in Chief, Transactions on Smart Grid

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS:

Editor's Comments:

Editor
Comments to the Author:
The reviewers raised concerns on the system models studied in the proposed research including the modelling details of the power electronics interface which has serious impact on the efficacy of the proposed method as claimed. The presentation is very poor and the paper needs re-writing in many places.


Reviewer 1 提出了4条意见;

Reviewer 2 提出了10条意见;

Reviewer 3 提出了8条意见。

这个应该算大修,请问这样录用的概率多大?
I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance.到底是什么意思?是说即便根据审稿人和主编的意见修改,文章也可能被拒吗?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-30 16:27:02
han.bw: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2017-04-01 15:56:07
本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2017-01-30 16:11:20
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

han.bw

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by bhl321023 at 2017-01-30 16:11:20
我觉得这篇文章很有可能被接受,编辑给了机会,语气也还行!因为看不到修改意见,不确定是大修还是小修。但是。不论大修小修,作者必须认真回答审稿人的问题,这个才是最重要的。I wish to emphasize that this is  ...

好的,非常感谢!务必逐条进行认真回复。
3楼2017-01-30 16:58:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peterflyer

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

peterflyer


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
han.bw: 金币+2, 有帮助 2017-04-01 15:55:48
han.bw: 金币+1 2017-04-01 15:56:46
这个属于大修。修改后被接受发表的几率取决于你对审稿人的问题的回答的好坏,能否让他们满意。
4楼2017-01-30 22:35:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

han.bw

新虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by peterflyer at 2017-01-30 22:35:33
这个属于大修。修改后被接受发表的几率取决于你对审稿人的问题的回答的好坏,能否让他们满意。

好的,只要还有机会就一定尽力争取!
5楼2017-01-31 14:26:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
6楼2017-01-31 23:36:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 han.bw 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 大佬们,工材口上会要什么条件?几个A +4 和尚敲小木鱼 2024-07-13 9/450 2024-07-14 01:31 by Pickfoot
[博后之家] 在职博后政策,在哪可以找到 +4 ccy001122 2024-07-10 4/200 2024-07-13 20:02 by chemhua
[基金申请] 再接再厉 +40 jewin5215212 2024-07-12 53/2650 2024-07-13 15:04 by MarkDeng
[基金申请] 卸载小木虫,一个月假期后再见 +9 走了002 2024-07-11 9/450 2024-07-13 14:13 by arthas_007
[电化学] 固态电解质成膜的问题。 10+3 丿氧气是你 2024-07-09 9/450 2024-07-13 13:20 by 丿氧气是你
[教师之家] 省自然限项 +9 Yyds55 2024-07-12 13/650 2024-07-13 09:48 by asdfgjiiuh
[论文投稿] 求助materials design这个杂志with editor要多久 +5 T&tt123 2024-07-08 7/350 2024-07-13 09:28 by T&tt123
[基金申请] 2024国家社科评审交流帖 +16 zyl_001 2024-07-07 29/1450 2024-07-12 22:33 by yxl578
[基金申请] 信息口 +4 豆小河 2024-07-12 7/350 2024-07-12 21:32 by Pickfoot
[基金申请] 听说今年没有c才能上会 +14 djdhhdhh 2024-07-12 19/950 2024-07-12 21:18 by baodingmu
[博后之家] 去院士团队做博后好吗? +8 如花美卷18 2024-07-09 10/500 2024-07-12 16:22 by lesheng095
[高分子] 对苯二甲酸的酯化问题 20+3 hp0228 2024-07-08 10/500 2024-07-12 11:24 by hp0228
[基金申请] 有没有A口流体力学的朋友 +12 不是233 2024-07-10 20/1000 2024-07-12 06:11 by kobe0107
[电化学] 聚合物固态电解质EIS测试 +3 htdnsdsg 2024-07-10 5/250 2024-07-12 05:07 by 当个小透明
[无机/物化] 怎么制备一价铜溶液 (金币+5) +5 卢本伟er 2024-07-08 11/550 2024-07-11 17:40 by czyzsu
[找工作] offer求比较 +9 yychemyy 2024-07-07 10/500 2024-07-10 23:54 by nrzxcvb
[基金申请] 国青还能中吗? +13 mengaiyy 2024-07-09 20/1000 2024-07-10 22:31 by mengaiyy
[教师之家] 过于相信别人对自己而言是一场灾难 +6 otani 2024-07-09 7/350 2024-07-10 08:49 by Quakerbird
[基金申请] 博后基金特别资助什么时候给资助证明? +4 much_peace 2024-07-09 5/250 2024-07-09 19:17 by much_peace
[基金申请] 国自科数理学部(A口)什么时候会评 +10 6543yes 2024-07-07 12/600 2024-07-09 16:44 by 6543yes
信息提示
请填处理意见