24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3830  |  回复: 15
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者米米薇将赠送您 10 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

米米薇

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] CBM二轮审稿一个接受一个拒绝怎么办 已有3人参与

前一段时间投了Construction & Building Materials的文章,大修之后重投,二轮审稿结束后,一个审稿人给的意见是接受,另一个审稿人给的意见是拒绝,下面是两个审稿人的意见:
Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed all my comments so I recommend the manuscript to be accepted for publication. I would strongly advise the authors to have the manuscript checked again by a native english speaker.
Reviewer #2: The authors have made detailed responses to the comments accordingly, and the overall quality of the manuscript have been improved to some extent. However, there are still too much careless spelling and grammar errors. Most of all, the reviewer think the authors have made a technical mistake on experimental design, especially for the study on effects of moisture content on carbonation of RFAs. Although authors have accordingly provided a detailed explanation for my question, it was still unscientific.
Therefore, I am very sorry to tell you that my decision is to reject this manuscript for publication in this journal.  
编辑给出的意见如下:
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider your paper for publication.  
请问一下大神们应该怎么办,修改的话是要怎么修,第二个审稿人也没有明确提出修改意见,应该如何修改?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yueyuzaiji

新虫 (初入文坛)

楼主,最终情况怎么样呀?
10楼2017-02-19 16:57:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

eiri

新虫 (知名作家)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-01-20 18:24:12
这个,感觉除非你能设法说服那个审稿人,否则比较难了。因为主编没有站你这里啊。ta要是想要你的文章这时候就会不理那个拒稿的了。不想放弃就继续努力

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2017-01-20 18:23:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2017-01-20 18:29:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

18213818611

金虫 (著名写手)

好好解释第二个审稿人的问题

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Thedarkesthouristhatbeforethedawn.Victorywon’tcometomeunlessIgotoit.
4楼2017-01-20 21:46:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见