24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5653  |  回复: 30
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

mhwhu

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 大家 帮我看看审稿意见,支个招啊 已有27人参与

专业最顶级的几种杂志之一吧。
这次审稿了半年,终于有意见了。之前投过一次,以没有试验验证为由拒了。隔了三个月,加上试验再投,直接被当做修改稿发给原来的一个审稿人审稿。
以下是审稿后回信所有内容。

大家帮忙看看,这个希望大不大。虽然是给的大修,除了语言和格式问题,其他几乎没有提问题。该怎么改最好。谢谢大家了,没有金币,求好心人。
dear ***:
Your revised manuscript, "***", which you submitted to “***”  for a possible publication as an original paper has been reviewed by the same reviewer who was involved in the first review stage and by the associate editor.

Based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in the present form and need be further revised and significantly improved as pointed out in the comments below.

There is in particular the need to make the paper better readable, in order to be able to accept it for publication. As already requested in the first review stage, it is mandatory to have the manuscript carefully edited for English before resubmission.

Our suggestion is that you take good care of the comments below, reorganize-improve the writing of your manuscript and have it edited for English. Please give clear evidence that this has been done by attaching to your submission the certificate by the English editing service provider.

In summary, when preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments.  Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript.

In order to submit your revised manuscript electronically, please access the following web site:

     ************

Your username is: ********
Your password is: ********

Please click "Author Login" to submit your revision.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Sincerely yours,

***
********************


COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:

General Assessment:
Is the content of the paper within the scope of the journal?  Yes
Is the title appropriate?  Yes
Does the paper make an original contribution to rock mechanics and rock engineering?  Yes
Does the paper consider findings from other investigations?  Yes
Could the paper be shortened?  Yes (please do so!)
Is the writing style appropriate?  No
Is the English editing appropriate?  No
Is the quality of figures appropriate? Yes
Are the references adequate and all of them necessary? Yes
Is the structure of the paper appropriate?  Yes/No
Does the abstract describe the work performed and the conclusions drawn?  Yes

Associate Editor:
According to the reviewer's comments and my checking, the article needs major revisions. The English writing must be improved. In addition, the manuscript is a little long with 35 pages of text, 15 pictures and 5 tables. I suggest authors to reduce the number of figures. Some pictures could be put into one, such as Figs.5 and 6, Figs. 7 and 8. Figs. 9 to 12, i.e. the schematic views of the multiscale characteristic and the microscopic bond shear failure face of two rocks, could also be simplified.

Reviewer #3: This manuscript reports analytical and experimental studies on the shear characteristics of rock joints filled with cement grout. Technically, the paper is worth to be published. However, the language in the current version is still unacceptable. Many sentences are unreadable. For example, Page 4 Line 11 "at least dozens of", Page 4 Line 22 "while when less than", Page 5 Line 1 "strength decrease", Page 5 Line 8 "tree-dimensional", Page 7 Line 1 "microstructure ranging from nanoscale to millimeter scale", etc. This manuscript needs a reliable and professional English editing before it can be accepted for publication.
Additionally, in Figure 5, "concaves", one letter "s" is in different color. In Figure 6, "concaves" in yellow color is not easily visible.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
本帖仅楼主可见
19楼2017-01-14 08:16:28
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
查看全部 31 个回答
4楼2017-01-13 16:48:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

doggier

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
按照要求改,提什么了,改什么

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2017-01-13 17:16:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

FlyFishxx

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
少年,主要是语言吧!语言改好了就没问题

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2017-01-13 17:37:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 6/300 2026-08-15 04:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 04:17 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 01:28 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +4 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 01:08 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +4 yuleib84 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 23:05 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +23 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 49/2450 2026-08-14 20:02 by zhaifei
[硕博家园] 请教兼职经验 +3 是阿文鸭 2026-08-09 3/150 2026-08-14 12:07 by HER12025
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +10 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 32/1600 2026-08-14 09:37 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +10 家与远方 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-14 02:08 by 绵羊哥哥
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 12/600 2026-08-13 23:20 by iwuli
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
信息提示
请填处理意见