24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1238  |  回复: 5

lij_yang

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 第一篇SCI审稿意见返回,审稿意见的意思有些不懂,求助! 已有3人参与

大家好,本人在10月17号第一篇SCI投稿,今天才收到审稿意见,大修,给出了以下的意见,前面说是语法问题,后面有三个comments,我对第三点意见没看懂,请大家帮忙看看是指什么意思,我该怎么回复比较得当,小女子拜谢!

           The paper is fine technically, as it contains many new experimental measurements on fluorinated thermoplastic polyurethanes. However, the paper is full of awkward sentences and English, especially in sections 2.2, and 3.1 to 3.6! These are related to incorrect English, especially disagreement between verbs/tenses and singular/plural. They should be rectified upon another careful reading of the manuscript. Otherwise, they diminish the value of the manuscript.

           In addition, the following comments should be taken into account during revision of the manuscript:

    1)        Section 3.1: The molecular weights and PDI values are not that high; they are typical of what one expects in these situations. The sentences sho uld be modified.
    2)        Section 3.3: Please do not start the section with a figure; start with text, followed by the figure.
    3)        The paper is an experimental one, with many experimental data (in Tables and Figures). All these are useful. And yet, there is not one independent replicate shown/reported. This would add more confidence in accepting the results presented and will also give an idea about the underlying error. Please add in the revised version of the manuscript.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lij_yang(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-01-04 21:19:14
本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2017-01-04 20:22:30
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

2011myfamily

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lij_yang(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-01-04 21:19:20
总体来说,这可不是坏事,而是肯定,你仔细想一想怎么把实验的客观性提高一下,怎么解释才能让他们相信实验结果,祝你顺利成功!
I love my family!
3楼2017-01-04 20:54:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

东动集散

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lij_yang(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-04 21:19:26
第三点说你的文章是实验型的,有很多实验数据都很有用,‘但是没有一个独立显示或报道的重复’,这里还是要根据你文章的内容理解,我理解为是不是缺少重复性的实验,验证你的数据可靠性。
4楼2017-01-04 20:56:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
5楼2017-01-04 23:11:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

程小星

新虫 (正式写手)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-01-04 23:38:53
实验结果不具有说服性,需要好好修改一下。认真修改问题不大,祝福

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2017-01-04 23:21:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 lij_yang 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见