24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 455  |  回复: 0
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者ll881018将赠送您 5 个金币

ll881018

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 麻烦各位大神帮忙看看这封拒稿信有能重投的暗示吗?

regret to inform you that in my opinion this manuscript is not ready for review in .  In general the process sedimentology should be slightly reworked, for example, missing from Table 1 is bedload or traction deposition.  If you plan to edit this manuscript then consider these points: the depositional model is not exactly new but it is a good study worthy of publication; the terms cohesive and non-cohesive are more typical than cohesionless; eight pages of rock photographs should probably be reduced by ~50%; "-ing" can be removed from the photograph annotations; and finally, format the manuscript text with wider margins and change the indentation for the references.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ll881018 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见