| 查看: 713 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 心随我动_cyf 的 10 个金币 | |||
心随我动_cyf木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大家帮看看对于这种审稿意见该怎么回复呢？
|
||
|
文章返回来大修。 审稿人一：The topic of the paper is interesting but it contains a number of serious flaws in data interpretation. Morover, the paper is extremely poorly written and contains inadequate expressions and term, which has hamppered the review of the paper. For example the figures are not numbered! I made tens of serious comments and suggestions on the pdf file of the manuscript and will not repeat them here. ……After finishing the reading of the paper, I had difficulties in finding specific values of this contribution specially compared to our current knowledge. This was confirmed by the Conclusions section, which contains really nothing but prsentation of some of the results obtained. 审稿人一是在文章上直接插入批注提问题的。尤其是在最后conclusion部分写：These are results. These are results too. This conclusion has little if anything with the goal of the paper! 审稿人二：……（一些专业问题）.Regarding the usage of language, the manuscript needs some improvement in this matter. The text contains some grammatical mistakes and some sentences are very hard to understand. This is critical point, because one cannot judge the quality of data and arguments unless the language is perfectly clear and unambiguous. 审稿人二在后面列上了二十几个具体问题。 感觉上被审稿人一批的屁都不是了，文章没有啥意义  。求大神们指点对于这种意见该怎么回复？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0703化学336分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
293求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
281求调剂（0805）
已经有8人回复
-
环境领域全国重点实验室招收博士1-2名
已经有3人回复
-
材料专硕306英一数二
已经有10人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
26博士申请
已经有3人回复
synfkkv297
金虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 587.4
- 帖子: 36
- 在线: 12.1小时
- 虫号: 3061066
- 注册: 2014-03-17
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 物理学I
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
心随我动_cyf: 金币+10, 好的 非常感谢啊！ 2016-11-15 23:24:37
自私的猫1988: 注意请勿做广告宣传 2016-11-16 08:15:39
心随我动_cyf: 金币+10 2017-02-27 14:57:39
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
心随我动_cyf: 金币+10, 好的 非常感谢啊！ 2016-11-15 23:24:37
自私的猫1988: 注意请勿做广告宣传 2016-11-16 08:15:39
心随我动_cyf: 金币+10 2017-02-27 14:57:39
|
知足吧，大修。你的careless部分太多了，什么图片没有number，数据解释不清，语音表述不清，语法错误！！等等。好在编辑应该比较喜欢你文章的idea，给你大修。回复审稿人意见要逐条回复，第一个审稿人不是有comment么，每条都回复下。如果是因为你粗心你也说一句 We have made correction according to the ;We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……; We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...这类的话，把response2reviewers多写几页没坏处。语言的话问题很多，建议找native speakers润色 最后，关于技术细节和内容，同样需要逐条回复，切记，对待审稿人意见要认真，虚心，细致回答。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
2楼2016-11-15 23:02:05
3楼2016-11-16 08:54:58
