[交流] 大家帮看看对于这种审稿意见该怎么回复呢？

文章返回来大修。 审稿人一：The topic of the paper is interesting but it contains a number of serious flaws in data interpretation. Morover, the paper is extremely poorly written and contains inadequate expressions and term, which has hamppered the review of the paper. For example the figures are not numbered! I made tens of serious comments and suggestions on the pdf file of the manuscript and will not repeat them here. ……After finishing the reading of the paper, I had difficulties in finding specific values of this contribution specially compared to our current knowledge. This was confirmed by the Conclusions section, which contains really nothing but prsentation of some of the results obtained. 审稿人一是在文章上直接插入批注提问题的。尤其是在最后conclusion部分写：These are results. These are results too. This conclusion has little if anything with the goal of the paper! 审稿人二：……（一些专业问题）.Regarding the usage of language, the manuscript needs some improvement in this matter. The text contains some grammatical mistakes and some sentences are very hard to understand. This is critical point, because one cannot judge the quality of data and arguments unless the language is perfectly clear and unambiguous.   审稿人二在后面列上了二十几个具体问题。 感觉上被审稿人一批的屁都不是了，文章没有啥意义。求大神们指点对于这种意见该怎么回复？

回复此楼