| 查看: 6765 | 回复: 43 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
两个审稿人和编辑意见是这样的，最后给了major revise文章可能接受吗，多少可能性 已有7人参与
|
||
|
Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper is good with a lot of work behind. Some welding experiments would be useful to contrast the simulation. Reviewer #2: This paper proposed a new way to improve the mechanical properties of the base metal and CG heat-affect zone。。。. This is in fact an interesting work with new findings and broad applications, which should merit the publication in the杂志名。。。。 The reviewer recommends the publication upon some minor points to be addressed: 1. Page 10. Fig. 3(c) is not clear, the figure mark "(c)" should not cover the data. The other letters in this figure are also not clear, which should be replaced and re-organized. 2. There should be a space between the number and unit in the whole manuscript. For example, at page 12, "228.8MPa" should be "228.8 MPa". I suggest the author correct this writing format and make sure all numbers and units consistent throughout the whole manuscript. Page 13, in Fig. 6, "engineering stress" and "engineering stain" should be "Engineering Stress" and "Engineering Strain" respectively. And the scale should be clear. 3. It would be better to quantify and summarize the distribution of。。。 in the processed steel. 4. Page 17, there should be a space between "Fig.9."and "Growth" in line 3. 5. The English is overall OK, but still needs some polishing, for instance, the abstract is kind of lengthy with too much technical details.. 6. Since the major advantage is improved mechanical properties, but to me there is only one result (Figure 6) talked about the quantitative number of mechanical improvement. It would be better to present more systematic mechanical testing data in figure or table, with error bar or range of values. Additional comments (Subject Editor): Title: I think it is unnecessarily long. It should not read like a mini paper. Keep in mind that the abstract always accompanies the title. A title must be as accurate, informative and as comprehensive as possible, yet as short as possible in order to attract the reader's attention, but without wasting words (hence journal's space and reader's time). Please shorten it to about 10 words max. I suggest adding the word "welding" to the list of keywords. Style of References: The authors should follow the reference protocol dictated by 杂志名. References should not be in lists or appended at the end of sentences. Each one of the cited sources must be discussed individually and explicitly to demonstrate their significance to your study. We ask that you use the authors' surnames as the subject of a verb, and then state in one or two sentences what they claim, what evidence they provide to support their claim, and how you evaluate their work. You must change your paper to meet this requirement for every reference you cite. Section headings tend to be too long and repetitive. Please shorten them to no more than 5 words each. Avoid unnecessary repetitions ( E.g. "mechanical properties of..." right under "mechanical properties" 第一次投稿，不是很清楚。编辑的态度严厉吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有48人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有29人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有12人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有11人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有10人回复
-
阿姨
已经有4人回复
-
一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗
已经有4人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有21人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有28人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有6人回复
magic_hit
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1790.2
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 225
- 在线: 32.8小时
- 虫号: 3186583
- 注册: 2014-05-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 常微分方程与动力系统
34楼2016-11-04 19:37:05
2楼2016-11-03 13:05:27
|
祝福！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2016-11-03 13:12:28
xysong6597
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1323.7
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 765
- 在线: 34.3小时
- 虫号: 4498824
- 注册: 2016-03-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁场与波
4楼2016-11-03 13:16:27
