24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lxisme

铁虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 639.3
散金: 155
红花: 1
帖子: 381
在线: 264.5小时
虫号: 1428457
注册: 2011-10-05
专业: 代数学

[求助] 两个审稿人和编辑意见是这样的，最后给了major revise文章可能接受吗，多少可能性已有7人参与

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The paper is good with a lot of work behind.
Some welding experiments would be useful to contrast the simulation.

Reviewer #2: This paper proposed a new way to improve the mechanical properties of the base metal and CG heat-affect zone。。。. This is in fact an interesting work with new findings and broad applications, which should merit the publication in the杂志名。。。。 The reviewer recommends the publication upon some minor points to be addressed:
1.    Page 10. Fig. 3(c) is not clear, the figure mark "(c)" should not cover the data. The other letters in this figure are also not clear, which should be replaced and re-organized.
2.    There should be a space between the number and unit in the whole manuscript. For example, at page 12, "228.8MPa" should be "228.8 MPa". I suggest the author correct this writing format and make sure all numbers and units consistent  throughout the whole manuscript. Page 13, in Fig. 6, "engineering stress" and "engineering stain" should be "Engineering Stress" and "Engineering Strain" respectively. And the scale should be clear.
3.    It would be better to quantify and summarize the distribution of。。。 in the processed steel.
4.    Page 17, there should be a space between "Fig.9."and "Growth" in line 3.
5.    The English is overall OK, but still needs some polishing, for instance, the abstract is kind of lengthy with too much technical details..
6.    Since the major advantage is improved mechanical properties, but to me there is only one result (Figure 6) talked about the quantitative number of mechanical improvement. It would be better to present more systematic mechanical testing data in figure or table, with error bar or range of values.

Additional comments (Subject Editor):

Title: I think it is unnecessarily long.  It should not read like a mini paper. Keep in mind that the abstract always accompanies the title. A title must be as accurate, informative and as comprehensive as possible, yet as short as possible in order to attract the reader's attention, but without wasting words (hence journal's space and reader's time). Please shorten it to about 10 words max.

I suggest adding the word "welding" to the list of keywords.

Style of References:
The authors should follow the reference protocol dictated by 杂志名. References should not be in lists or appended at the end of sentences. Each one of the cited sources must be discussed individually and explicitly to demonstrate their significance to your study.  We ask that you use the authors' surnames as the subject of a verb, and then state in one or two sentences what they claim, what evidence they provide to support their claim, and how you evaluate their work.
You must change your paper to meet this requirement for every reference you cite.

Section headings tend to be too long and repetitive. Please shorten them to no more than 5 words each.  Avoid unnecessary repetitions ( E.g. "mechanical properties of..." right under "mechanical properties"
第一次投稿，不是很清楚。编辑的态度严厉吗？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写已经有11人回复
救命帖已经有5人回复
限项规定已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴没有产物点出现呢已经有9人回复
招博士已经有3人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗已经有35人回复
最失望的一年已经有18人回复
求推荐博导已经有4人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊已经有5人回复
疑惑？已经有5人回复

1楼 2016-11-03 12:55:15

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

意得辑

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

SCI发表辅导

应助: 118 (高中生)
金币: 27.7
散金: 5309
红花: 48
帖子: 710
在线: 624.8小时
虫号: 2645242
注册: 2013-09-10

【答案】应助回帖

商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容

★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
lxisme: 金币+3, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢你但是没有金币了 2016-11-03 18:30:57

整体来说意见是正面的，编辑和审稿人提出了比较细节的错误，显示楼主在排版上还不够细心。

建议先将意见进行分类：
1. 内容修改：关于数据、讨论不够详细、图片、摘要太冗长等等的都算
2. 语句问题：这边特别要注意的是编辑提到的论文题目太长，内文标题重复性太高，都需要重新改写
3. 排版：审稿人提到的空格问题，编辑提到的引用格式问题
4. 语言：虽说没有大问题，但审稿人还是建议润色

编辑还建议将 welding 加入关键词中，不要忘记了。

先将内容和排版问题处理完，把内容都定下来，最后再进行润色。

在回答审稿意见的时候，必须要清楚说明做了什么修改，对于不同意的意见提出论述，可以参考意得辑专家视点上的几篇文章：
怎么写好回复信或反驳信？https://www.editage.cn/insights/ ... eat-rebuttal-letter
回复同行评审意见的要与不要https://www.editage.cn/insights/ ... r-reviewer-comments
回复审稿意见 9 大诀https://www.editage.cn/insights/ ... s-by-peer-reviewers
如果我没有办法根据审稿人的建议修改，该怎么回复？https://www.editage.cn/insights/ ... eviewers-suggestion

祝修稿顺利！

- Eddy 博士