24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2423  |  回复: 1
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者jianjun5025将赠送您 10 个金币

jianjun5025

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 捉急!第一次投递JMBBM,四个多月返回返修1稿,各位大侠看修改后机会有多大? 已有1人参与

第一次投递JMBBM,四个多月返回返修1稿,各位大侠看修改后机会有多大?
给点建议看第一点如何回复希望才大?
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.
However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript .
Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. One issue in particular that is important is to address the suitability of your paper for JMBBM. Please articulate that clearly in your cover letter.

Reviewer #1: I have reviewed the manuscript and have the following comments.
The manuscript is not suited to the Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials or the Journal is not suited to the manuscript, either way.

Firstly, the content of the manuscript in its present form has nothing to do with biomaterials. Indeed, Ti-6Al-4V has been widely used as a biomedical material. However, it is not the typical Ti-6Al-4V. Instead, it is the extra low interstitial (ELI) Ti-6Al-4V, known as ELI Ti-6Al-4V, which requires extra low levels of interstitial elements. The composition of the feedstock material used in this study, the 1-mm diameter Ti-6Al-4V wire, does not meet the requirements for ELI Ti-6Al-4V (both O and H are above the limits). In addition, after plasma arc deposition in an argon atmosphere, the content of the interstitial elements will further increase making the alloy further away from ELI Ti-6Al-4V.

Secondly, additive manufacturing by plasma arc deposition is attractive mainly for fast manufacturing and for the manufacture of relatively large but less intricate parts. It is difficult to justify the use of this process for the manufacture of a part or component for biomedical purposes. All current implant parts made by additive manufacturing are manufactured by powder-bed based additive manufacturing processes.
It would deliver misleading information to the readers of this journal. This manuscript is typical for a normal materials processing journal. It is difficult to understand why the authors have chosen JMBBM (another comment is that, technically, the manuscript is far from concise and the authors may wish to condense it for submission to a different journal)

Reviewer #2: In it's current state the manuscript needs to be revised significantly.

Reviewer #3: The authors report a study on the continuous plasma arc additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V. The microstructure, phase formation, texture and mechanical properties are systematically studied. The underlying mechanism for the formation of the phases and microstructure are also discussed in detail. The findings are interesting and provide some important insights regarding to this novel plasma additive manufacturing process of Ti alloys. There are still some minor issues that the author should make clear:
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lingyuesiyu

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

如果有好的期刊就转投,因为改起来很耗时间,重投很慢。如果有时间就认真改,有机会的,祝你好运!
2楼2020-04-21 00:07:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jianjun5025 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见