| 查看: 2533 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者jianjun5025将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
jianjun5025铁虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
捉急！第一次投递JMBBM，四个多月返回返修1稿，各位大侠看修改后机会有多大？ 已有1人参与
|
|
|
第一次投递JMBBM，四个多月返回返修1稿，各位大侠看修改后机会有多大？ 给点建议看第一点如何回复希望才大？ The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript . Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. One issue in particular that is important is to address the suitability of your paper for JMBBM. Please articulate that clearly in your cover letter. Reviewer #1: I have reviewed the manuscript and have the following comments. The manuscript is not suited to the Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials or the Journal is not suited to the manuscript, either way. Firstly, the content of the manuscript in its present form has nothing to do with biomaterials. Indeed, Ti-6Al-4V has been widely used as a biomedical material. However, it is not the typical Ti-6Al-4V. Instead, it is the extra low interstitial (ELI) Ti-6Al-4V, known as ELI Ti-6Al-4V, which requires extra low levels of interstitial elements. The composition of the feedstock material used in this study, the 1-mm diameter Ti-6Al-4V wire, does not meet the requirements for ELI Ti-6Al-4V (both O and H are above the limits). In addition, after plasma arc deposition in an argon atmosphere, the content of the interstitial elements will further increase making the alloy further away from ELI Ti-6Al-4V. Secondly, additive manufacturing by plasma arc deposition is attractive mainly for fast manufacturing and for the manufacture of relatively large but less intricate parts. It is difficult to justify the use of this process for the manufacture of a part or component for biomedical purposes. All current implant parts made by additive manufacturing are manufactured by powder-bed based additive manufacturing processes. It would deliver misleading information to the readers of this journal. This manuscript is typical for a normal materials processing journal. It is difficult to understand why the authors have chosen JMBBM (another comment is that, technically, the manuscript is far from concise and the authors may wish to condense it for submission to a different journal) Reviewer #2: In it's current state the manuscript needs to be revised significantly. Reviewer #3: The authors report a study on the continuous plasma arc additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V. The microstructure, phase formation, texture and mechanical properties are systematically studied. The underlying mechanism for the formation of the phases and microstructure are also discussed in detail. The findings are interesting and provide some important insights regarding to this novel plasma additive manufacturing process of Ti alloys. There are still some minor issues that the author should make clear: |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有20人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有8人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有7人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有48人回复
-
filecode
已经有10人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有37人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有7人回复
lingyuesiyu
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 248.8
- 散金: 27
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 180
- 在线: 103.1小时
- 虫号: 1883974
- 注册: 2012-07-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
2楼2020-04-21 00:07:07
