| 查看: 699 | 回复: 1 | |||
zhaojing5022新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
这是审稿人提的问题，没理解要让干什么，求翻译 已有1人参与
|
|
Question 3: The reference potential for the CVs (Fig. 6) should be indicated, either on the axis label and/or in the figure caption. Question 4: For the insets in Fig. 6, the best-fit lines should be shown, as opposed to just connecting the successive data points. Question 5: I fail to see how the redox process is diffusion controlled for these compounds. The complexes are insoluble and immobilized on the graphite working electrode, so there shouldn’t be any diffusion of the electroactive species. The peak current should then scale linearly with the scan rate, as is typically observed for immobilized species. The authors should revisit this data and reconsider their conclusion before publishing. If they are confident in their conclusion of a diffusion-limited process, I would appreciate some reasonable chemical explanation for why the current is diffusion controlled. Question 6: It is unclear what conclusions are to be drawn from the cyclic voltammetry. In general the authors do a better job of describing the results than contextualizing them, but particularly for the CVs the data is presented but not explained, and no chemical insights are provided. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料专业344求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
085404 298分求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
296求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
初试261
已经有6人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料085601调剂
已经有25人回复
-
272分材料子求调剂
已经有23人回复
-
22408调剂求助
已经有7人回复
-
调剂
已经有17人回复
-
材料类284调剂
已经有43人回复
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhaojing5022: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2016-10-25 15:39:08
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhaojing5022: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2016-10-25 15:39:08
|
问题3：循环伏安图（图6）中应当在轴上或标题注释里标上参考电位。 问题4：图6的插图中不该仅仅把数据点顺连，而应当给出最佳拟合线。 问题5：我无法认同这些化合物的氧化还原反应是由扩散控制的。这些复合物不溶于液体而附着在石墨工作电极上，所以不应该存在电活性物质的扩散。与一般此类不可移动附着物的情况相仿，峰值电流应与扫描速率成线性正比。作者们应该重新审视数据并重新斟酌结论。若是作者们对扩散限制过程这个结论有信心，那么我会期待读到关于为什么电流是扩散控制的的合理化学解释。 问题6：从循环伏安图中得出的结论没有清晰地表达出来。一般来讲，文献作者会更好的描述结果而不是放在上下文中（让读者自行理解），尤其是针对循环伏安图的只放结果而不给出化学反应的见解。 |
2楼2016-10-25 00:35:01
