| 查看: 6712 | 回复: 31 | ||
[求助]
投稿optics letters被拒了，这个审稿意见还能重投吗？ 已有5人参与
|
||
投稿审了一个多月被拒了，这个审稿意见看着不是很好啊 。上一次投OL，第一被拒但是编辑建议修改重投，二稿就录了。这一次只说不能接收，大家看看还可以修改重投么？Manuscript ID: XXX Type: letter Title: XXX Author: XXX; XXX Dear Dr. XXX: We are returning the comments of the reviewers. In view of their recommendations, I cannot accept your manuscript for publication in Optics Letters. Thank you for the opportunity to consider your contribution. We regret that it was not possible for us to send you a more favorable report. Sincerely, Antonella Bogoni Topical Editor, Optics Letters --------------------------- Reviewer 1: In this paper the authors introduce a beam deflector and optical coupler based on an array of slits with varying depths on a metal film. In my opinion, this letter should not be accepted in its current form, and major revisions are required before it could be considered for publication. The major issue is the low quality of presentation. More specifically: 1. The quality of English language usage throughout the paper should be improved. There are several typos throughout the paper. Some examples: “efficient refractive index”, “defection angle”, “irradiates the planet”, “while it can have further promotion to cut some calculation steps”, “two opposite progresses”, “cancelled together”, “will have an inverse proportion”, “deflection angel”, “the structure is high efficient”. 2. What are the units on the vertical axis of Figure 3? 3. It is not clear what Figure 4 shows and what its purpose is. What is the incident source? How are transmission and reflection defined in this figure? What are their units? There will be strong reflection at the lower boundary of the slit, so it is not clear what the point is of measuring transmission in the short-circuited slit. If the metal is lossless, the transmission will be zero. 4. The parameters of the simulated structures should be provided in the captions of all figures to avoid any confusion. As an example Figures 2(b) and 5 both show results for deflection angle of 60 degrees for two different structures. The geometrical parameters of these structures should be included in the corresponding figure captions. 5. Figure 7: The text in both colorbars is impossible to read. In addition, it is not clear why both Figures 7(a) and 7(b) are needed. 6. Figure 8: How are the coupling ratio and reflection defined? Reviewer 2: In this work, the authors present two plasmonic grating-based devices with high performance: a beam deflector and a waveguide coupler. A numerical simulation is used to single out the role of the different structure parameters (width and depth of the grooves) and tune them in order to optimize the overall device performance (reflectivity or coupling efficiency). On one hand, the method is clear and easily understandable by anybody with a basic optics background. On the other hand, the work is very focused on optimizing the design parameters of an existing device, and, most important, lacks of any experimental validation. So, with no experimental evidence and no insight in the simulation details, it is hard to comment on whether the claimed numbers are more than “scientifically sound”. Regarding the manuscript organization, my only remark is that the coupling device is introduced very abruptly after fig.5, and the reader might not realize that a different device is being described rather than an additional optimization step for the deflector. Also, there is a quite large number of funny typos, like “deflection angel”, “irradiates the planet”, “TM model” or “the inside silt”. Based on these considerations, it is quite hard to me to give a decisive recomendation for this work. I would surely have no doubts if one of the described devices had been actually manufactured and tested. As it is, i would probably submit the manuscript to a more application-oriented optics journal. Reviewer 3: The authors address the new beam deflector and optical coupler structure based on plasmonic nano-slit. The later part of article proposed the new optical coupler. This optical coupler is attractive for the high efficiency and simple structure. But concrete technical usages or applications are proposed in few examples. The main part of the article is to discuss the structure of the deflector. It applies the spatially variable depth slit whose similar structure has already been proposed by Y.Zhao et al, OE, 18, 23458. Even though present article discusses reflection type, the present design looks an incremental work. If the authors stress this part, some experimental evidences would be expected. From these reasons I cannot recommend this paper for the publications in Optics Letters by luck of enough novelty or evidences required by general readers in the journal. Questions and Comments 1. Is it able to define the “total reflection” in the region whose scale is comparable to that of the optical wavelength? 2. What is the concrete usage or other application for the new optical coupler? Is it applicable for the solar cell device such discussed in K. Takatori et. al, J. Phys. D,49, 185106? 3. How do you measure the 80.73% coupling efficiency experimentally? 4. Please insert unit of k in figure 3 and scale in figure 5 or 7. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有4人回复
-
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有8人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有14人回复
-
计算机、0854电子信息（085401-058412）调剂
已经有5人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有5人回复
-
溴的反应液脱色
已经有7人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有12人回复
-
基金申报
已经有4人回复
-
常年博士招收(双一流，工科)
已经有4人回复
yishifeiyun
银虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6693.7
- 散金: 226
- 帖子: 1854
- 在线: 177小时
- 虫号: 2881951
- 注册: 2013-12-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 激光
15楼2016-10-22 00:43:33
5楼2016-10-21 11:57:49
muchongwoai
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 175 (高中生)
- 金币: 13239.8
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 1298
- 在线: 687小时
- 虫号: 1137313
- 注册: 2010-11-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 煤炭地下开采
3楼2016-10-21 07:56:14
4楼2016-10-21 08:01:26
匿名
用户注销 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1032 (博后)
- 金币: 4936.5
- 散金: 1334
- 红花: 15
- 帖子: 2443
- 在线: 1210.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2012-10-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 大气遥感和大气探测
29楼2016-10-24 22:46:57
商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容|
问题有三，第一创新性不足，第二，实验不够充分，第三，语言不咋地。 如果可以补充实验的话可以考虑重投。 语言的话可以看看美国AJE，润色的很地道。价格的话，以6000单词为例。标准润色就是润色一次，大概rmb 1300元；高级的话就是无限次润色一直到发表，是3000元左右。 你可以看看 https://www.aje.com 另外记得首单是优惠20刀的 |
31楼2016-11-07 13:49:39
2楼2016-10-21 00:09:21
6楼2016-10-21 13:10:28
kakarote
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.055
- 金币: 5355.9
- 散金: 21690
- 红花: 75
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 11491
- 在线: 426.1小时
- 虫号: 614324
- 注册: 2008-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用光学
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-10-21 16:36:07
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-10-21 16:36:07
|
问题这么多，还是好好斟酌一下再投吧。感觉OL最注重的就是创新点，不知道你文章里体现的怎么样。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
7楼2016-10-21 16:14:17
xiaomucas
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 金币: 2264.5
- 散金: 240
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 641
- 在线: 662.8小时
- 虫号: 2685420
- 注册: 2013-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
8楼2016-10-21 19:20:14
yishifeiyun
银虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6693.7
- 散金: 226
- 帖子: 1854
- 在线: 177小时
- 虫号: 2881951
- 注册: 2013-12-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 激光
9楼2016-10-21 20:30:08
10楼2016-10-21 21:29:20