24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3055)
>虫友互识 (379)
>文献求助 (244)
>硕博家园 (165)
>导师招生 (156)
>论文投稿 (93)
>博后之家 (82)
>招聘信息布告栏 (79)
>休闲灌水 (79)
>考博 (61)
>基金申请 (59)
>教师之家 (52)
>金融投资 (43)
>找工作 (33)
>考研 (31)
>论文道贺祈福 (29)

返回列表

wangjinyun

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 4088.8
散金: 121
红花: 3
沙发: 1
帖子: 836
在线: 79小时
虫号: 3926629
注册: 2015-06-16
专业: 流体力学

[交流] 各位师兄姐妹审查一周意见是啥意思？已有1人参与

CC: longmire@umn.edu, ctropea@sla.tu-darmstadt.de, j.westerweel@tudelft.nl

Dear Mr wang jinyun,

Many thanks for your submission of the above manuscript to Experiments in Fluids. It is a policy at Experiments in Fluids to examine all incoming manuscripts to determine whether they fit with the theme of Experiments in Fluids and that they will have a fair chance of eventual acceptance after review. We do this to reduce the amount of time spent by our authors, associate editors and reviewers.

In essence, our journal publishes two types of contributions. The first focuses on novel experimental techniques, typically involving assessment of variations of quantitative parameters within the flow volume. The second type of contribution uses existing experimental techniques to provide in-depth insight into the flow, thereby yielding a better understanding of the flow physics.

In consultation with one of my fellow Editors-in-Chief, I have examined your manuscript

EXIF-D-16-00413

Analysis of Nano Iron Powder Metal Fuel Motor Nozzle Two-Phase ?Flow Characteristics ?

in detail and come to the following viewpoint.

Your manuscript describes a simulation of flow ejected from a model of a rocket nozzle. ?Some performance parameters from an experimental nozzle test are compared against the simulation results. ?While we do sometimes publish studies that include numerical simulations, the experimental component of the study and any related physical analysis must always be the dominant component of the contribution. ?In your manuscript, we find that the dominant component is really the simulations. Therefore we deem your manuscript to be out of scope of Experiments in Fluids.

Based on considerable experience, if your manuscript were to undergo the regular review process, we feel that the referees would come to the same conclusion. Therefore, in order to save you time, I am withdrawing your contribution, which has no negative implications.

We would like to thank you for considering Experiments in Fluids and wish you the best in your on-going endeavours.

Sincerely,

Ellen Longmire
Editor-in-Chief
Experiments in Fluids

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼