| 查看: 1143 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
系统发育数据分析步骤求助 已有1人参与
|
|
Sequences were aligned with CLUSTALW (Thompson et al.1994) and the alignment was manually refined using Genedoc (Nicholas et al.1997). The aligned matrix was subjected to a neighbour-joining (NJ) analysis using the Kimura two parameter distance estimates (Kimura 1980). Constant sites were subsequently removed from the alignments. Then the matrix was first subjected to a maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis, searching for the appropriate evolutionary model using Modeltest (Posada and Crandall 1998), and then inputting the appropriate model(s) obtained from the likelihood ratio tests and the Akaike information criterion (AIC), into the ML analysis. All analyses were carried out using (Swofford 1998). Because some sequences from the same species were diverged into different clades, we compared the GC content, the sequence length, and the nucleotide difference among them. Based on the methods of Mayol and Rosselló (2001) we identified the rDNA sequences that appeared to represent paralogous loci. These sequences were excluded in subsequent phylogenetic analysis. The consensus sequence for each group was created with BioEdit (Hall 1999) and aligned with CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al.1994) to show the major difference of the types. The phylogenetic analyses based on the reduced sequence matrix were conducted using parsimony and distance methods with PAUP* 4.0 (Swofford 1998). We first carried out a NJ analysis using the Kimura two parameter distance estimates (Kimura 1980). Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed by heuristic search, tree bisection reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, and RANDOM stepwise addition with 100 replicates. To find the evolutionary model that fits best for given data, we subjected the alignment of the sequences to Modeltest (Posada and Crandall 1998) v3.7. The parameters of the best fit model were then used as input for a ML analysis. Topological robustness was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 500 replicates (Felsenstein 1985). In all analyses the functional outgroup (FOG) (Watrous and Wheeler 1981) used was P. heteroclada. 求大神解决几个问题:第一:Genedoc里要矫正到什么程度就可以了?第二:The aligned matrix was subjected to a neighbour-joining (NJ) analysis using the Kimura two parameter distance estimates。这句话是在CLUSTALW 里进行操作,还是在PAUP 4.0里?第三:Constant sites were subsequently removed from the alignments.为什么要删除Constant sites 后再进行ML分析?第四: inputting the appropriate model(s) obtained from the likelihood ratio tests and the Akaike information criterion (AIC), into the ML analysis.找到最适模型后怎么导入到ML分析中?第五:MP树是什么时候构建?万能的大神快来帮帮我吧,已经卡在这个点上半个多月了。。。 |
» 猜你喜欢
Calderasib理化性质与实验操作技术笔记
已经有0人回复
RMC-6291怎么用?RAS(ON) 三重复合物工具化合物的实验室实操要点
已经有0人回复
化学工程及工业化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有245人回复
苯并呋咱全解析:NBD 荧光衍生化试剂母核的化学特性与实验室应用
已经有0人回复
生物质炭与活化剂氢氧化钾混合注意事项
已经有0人回复
科研人必读:新一代 KRAS G12C 抑制剂 Olomorasib 的研究进展
已经有0人回复
BT-11(Omilancor)研究化合物全解析:从分子结构到实验应用要点
已经有0人回复
富马酸贝达喹啉:二芳基喹啉类工具化合物的化学特征
已经有0人回复
BT投稿with editor状态快两周了,正常吗
已经有25人回复
Silevertinib(BDTX-1535)结构拆解:炔基双环片段为何成为合成瓶颈
已经有0人回复
RO4929097 解析:双苯并氮杂䓬骨架与 Notch 通路实验设计要点
已经有0人回复
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2017-06-13 08:15:09










回复此楼