| 查看: 636 | 回复: 3 | |||
hikuaidian铁虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
一个据稿，一个小修，编辑给据了，能申诉么？还是转投？多谢 已有2人参与
|
|
回信如下： Dear Dr. xx, Reviewers' comments on your paper referenced above have now been received. You will see that they advise against publication of your work. Therefore, I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources. For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper presents a xxx model and xxx method for it, simulation for xxx model are provided in frequency domain and time domain, respectively. The author has a good scientific writing style and figure format, and the mathematical deduction is rigorous. However, I suggest that some experimental data should be provided to prove the accuracy of the xxx model. Reviewer #2: This paper reported a xxx model by xxx, leading to reduced computational costs. The proposed model can be computationally advantageous. Overall, the analytical work is valuable and of archival value, which can be accepted if the authors can overcome the following shortcomings: （三条小的问题） 请各位热心的虫友帮分析下，是该申诉一下呢，还是直接转投？谢谢！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文撤稿了
已经有8人回复
-
博士申请
已经有7人回复
-
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有8人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有4人回复
-
评审有感
已经有27人回复
-
河北省自然科学基金
已经有9人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有5人回复
-
某211大学教师把个人教师官方主页改成:我跑了我跑了我跑了!官宣跑路！
已经有5人回复
-
26/27申博自荐
已经有9人回复
-
博士申请
已经有3人回复
2楼2016-09-14 08:28:01
hikuaidian
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 565
- 帖子: 150
- 在线: 88.5小时
- 虫号: 1028208
- 注册: 2010-05-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
3楼2016-09-14 12:00:47
kakarote
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.055
- 金币: 5365.9
- 散金: 21690
- 红花: 75
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 11493
- 在线: 426.1小时
- 虫号: 614324
- 注册: 2008-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用光学
4楼2016-09-14 12:16:16