| 查看: 696 | 回复: 3 | |||
hikuaidian铁虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
一个据稿,一个小修,编辑给据了,能申诉么?还是转投?多谢 已有2人参与
|
|
回信如下: Dear Dr. xx, Reviewers' comments on your paper referenced above have now been received. You will see that they advise against publication of your work. Therefore, I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources. For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper presents a xxx model and xxx method for it, simulation for xxx model are provided in frequency domain and time domain, respectively. The author has a good scientific writing style and figure format, and the mathematical deduction is rigorous. However, I suggest that some experimental data should be provided to prove the accuracy of the xxx model. Reviewer #2: This paper reported a xxx model by xxx, leading to reduced computational costs. The proposed model can be computationally advantageous. Overall, the analytical work is valuable and of archival value, which can be accepted if the authors can overcome the following shortcomings: (三条小的问题) 请各位热心的虫友帮分析下,是该申诉一下呢,还是直接转投?谢谢! 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
» 猜你喜欢
各位大神,目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件?
已经有15人回复
国社科系统bug了,是不是要放榜了?
已经有10人回复
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有9人回复
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有4人回复
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组|2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有11人回复
申博发邮件
已经有11人回复
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复

2楼2016-09-14 08:28:01
hikuaidian
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 565
- 帖子: 150
- 在线: 88.5小时
- 虫号: 1028208
- 注册: 2010-05-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用

3楼2016-09-14 12:00:47
kakarote
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.055
- 金币: 5367.9
- 散金: 21690
- 红花: 75
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 11493
- 在线: 426.1小时
- 虫号: 614324
- 注册: 2008-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用光学
4楼2016-09-14 12:16:16










回复此楼