| 查看: 592 | 回复: 3 | |||
hikuaidian铁虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
一个据稿，一个小修，编辑给据了，能申诉么？还是转投？多谢 已有2人参与
|
|
回信如下： Dear Dr. xx, Reviewers' comments on your paper referenced above have now been received. You will see that they advise against publication of your work. Therefore, I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources. For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper presents a xxx model and xxx method for it, simulation for xxx model are provided in frequency domain and time domain, respectively. The author has a good scientific writing style and figure format, and the mathematical deduction is rigorous. However, I suggest that some experimental data should be provided to prove the accuracy of the xxx model. Reviewer #2: This paper reported a xxx model by xxx, leading to reduced computational costs. The proposed model can be computationally advantageous. Overall, the analytical work is valuable and of archival value, which can be accepted if the authors can overcome the following shortcomings: （三条小的问题） 请各位热心的虫友帮分析下，是该申诉一下呢，还是直接转投？谢谢！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有27人回复
-
所感
已经有3人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有11人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有8人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
26申博（荧光探针方向，有机合成）
已经有4人回复
2楼2016-09-14 08:28:01
hikuaidian
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 565
- 帖子: 150
- 在线: 88.5小时
- 虫号: 1028208
- 注册: 2010-05-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
3楼2016-09-14 12:00:47
kakarote
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.055
- 金币: 5355.9
- 散金: 21690
- 红花: 75
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 11491
- 在线: 426.1小时
- 虫号: 614324
- 注册: 2008-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用光学
4楼2016-09-14 12:16:16