| 查看: 1101 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 BioEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
[交流]
发现个奇葩的:第三作者举报自己在cell文章造假,结果找了两家其他实验室证明可重现 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
见链接，这情况头一次见啊，好几年前的一篇Cell，结果今年第三作者突然跳出来说自己造假 然后也不知道是通讯作者还是Cell编辑部，找了另外两个实验室，又做了一遍。结果发现可以重现。。。就不了了之了 https://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(16)31159-X We, the editors of Cell, published an Editorial Expression of Concern (https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.038) earlier this year regarding issues raised about Figures 2F, 2H, and 3G of the above article. Dr. Yao-Yun Liang, who performed the experiments in question, claimed to have manipulated his experiments to achieve pre-determined results. The corresponding author, Dr. Xin-Hua Feng, refuted the claims of falsification. In the intervening time, two independent labs have carried out experiments attempting to reproduce the data in question. This Editorial Note is to inform the community about the outcome of this process. Those two labs have now completed their experiments, and their data largely confirm the central conclusions drawn from the original figures. Although this does not resolve the conflicting claims, based on the information available to us at this time, we will take no further action. We would like to thank the independent labs who invested significant time and effort in ensuring the accuracy of the scientific record. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
xiaohaizi0220
木虫 (正式写手)
基础研发之沉默
- BioEPI: 2
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 3054.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 568
- 在线: 88.4小时
- 虫号: 315240
- 注册: 2007-02-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化学
2楼2016-09-18 08:55:19
