| 查看: 1643 | 回复: 4 | ||||
sybgyq木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
编辑让我按照审稿人的意见改，可是审稿人的意见都是正面的，怎么办 已有3人参与
|
|
编辑让我按照审稿人的意见改，可是审稿人的意见都是正面的，怎么办？ 我润润色然后 感谢下审稿人，上传上去，信件中和编辑在提一下审稿人的正面评价可以不？ 附上编辑信件。 Dear Prof. 。。。。, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Pleae return your revision within 90 days. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: https://ees.elsevier.com/aescte/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Please note that we allow 30 days for author revisions. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, xxx, PhD Associate Editor Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1:xxx modulation family based on xxx pulse called xxx was proposed for GNSS. Meanwhile, the detail performances of it were given, including tracking accuracy, multipath mitigation, anti-jamming. Simulation results show that the new signal modulation method outperformances the existing methods in the aspects of spectral efficiency and less OOB emissions. The theoretical analysis and simulation results are abundant. Reviewer #2: A xxx pulse and thexxx modulation family based on TDRC pulse called xxx are introduced in this paper. The multipath model analysis approach and the evaluation of the proposed modulation and existing modulations include interesting results with valuable scientific importance. Navigation performance is assessed for the xxx signals and this is compared with existing modulation schemes in terms of various parameters such as tracking accuracy, multipath mitigation, anti-jamming performance, spectral efficiency. The presented modulation scheme in this study is also important in the achievement of additional degrees of freedom for GNSS signal design. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求调剂
已经有23人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
304求调剂（085602，过四级，一志愿985）
已经有17人回复
-
302分求调剂 一志愿安徽大学085601
已经有12人回复
-
288环境专硕,求调材料方向
已经有23人回复
-
环境专硕调剂
已经有6人回复
-
22408 调剂材料
已经有6人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
085600材料与化工301分求调剂院校
已经有19人回复
liouzhan654
版主 (知名作家)
- 应助: 798 (博后)
- 贵宾: 5.504
- 金币: 53654.6
- 散金: 5660
- 红花: 182
- 沙发: 8
- 帖子: 9431
- 在线: 2139.6小时
- 虫号: 2048939
- 注册: 2012-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 传热传质学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2016-09-05 20:34:00
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
sybgyq: 金币+8, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢你 2016-09-06 09:31:51
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
sybgyq: 金币+8, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢你 2016-09-06 09:31:51
|
编辑让我按照审稿人的意见改，可是审稿人的意见都是正面的，怎么办？ 我润润色然后 感谢下审稿人，上传上去，信件中和编辑在提一下审稿人的正面评价可以不？ 楼主润色文章以后上传，在cover letter中感谢编辑和审稿人即可，不需要列出正面评价。 Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. |
3楼2016-09-05 20:46:27
4楼2016-09-05 22:16:18
sybgyq
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1839.1
- 散金: 6941
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 2390
- 在线: 693.8小时
- 虫号: 2661254
- 注册: 2013-09-17
- 专业: 通信理论与系统
5楼2016-09-06 09:33:35
