| 查看: 1628 | 回复: 4 | ||||
sybgyq木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
编辑让我按照审稿人的意见改,可是审稿人的意见都是正面的,怎么办 已有3人参与
|
|
编辑让我按照审稿人的意见改,可是审稿人的意见都是正面的,怎么办? 我润润色然后 感谢下审稿人,上传上去,信件中和编辑在提一下审稿人的正面评价可以不? 附上编辑信件。 Dear Prof. 。。。。, The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed Pleae return your revision within 90 days. To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: https://ees.elsevier.com/aescte/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] Please note that we allow 30 days for author revisions. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, xxx, PhD Associate Editor Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1:xxx modulation family based on xxx pulse called xxx was proposed for GNSS. Meanwhile, the detail performances of it were given, including tracking accuracy, multipath mitigation, anti-jamming. Simulation results show that the new signal modulation method outperformances the existing methods in the aspects of spectral efficiency and less OOB emissions. The theoretical analysis and simulation results are abundant. Reviewer #2: A xxx pulse and thexxx modulation family based on TDRC pulse called xxx are introduced in this paper. The multipath model analysis approach and the evaluation of the proposed modulation and existing modulations include interesting results with valuable scientific importance. Navigation performance is assessed for the xxx signals and this is compared with existing modulation schemes in terms of various parameters such as tracking accuracy, multipath mitigation, anti-jamming performance, spectral efficiency. The presented modulation scheme in this study is also important in the achievement of additional degrees of freedom for GNSS signal design. |
» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有7人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有19人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗?
已经有19人回复
请教限项目规定
已经有3人回复
基金委咋了?2026年的指南还没有出来?
已经有10人回复
基金申报
已经有6人回复
推荐一本书
已经有13人回复
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有8人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
计算机、0854电子信息(085401-058412)调剂
已经有5人回复
liouzhan654
版主 (知名作家)
- 应助: 798 (博后)
- 贵宾: 5.504
- 金币: 53653.6
- 散金: 5660
- 红花: 181
- 沙发: 8
- 帖子: 9431
- 在线: 2139.6小时
- 虫号: 2048939
- 注册: 2012-10-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 传热传质学
- 管辖: 论文投稿

2楼2016-09-05 20:34:00
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-

专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345462
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127553
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sybgyq: 金币+8, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢你 2016-09-06 09:31:51
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sybgyq: 金币+8, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢你 2016-09-06 09:31:51
|
编辑让我按照审稿人的意见改,可是审稿人的意见都是正面的,怎么办? 我润润色然后 感谢下审稿人,上传上去,信件中和编辑在提一下审稿人的正面评价可以不? 楼主润色文章以后上传,在cover letter中感谢编辑和审稿人即可,不需要列出正面评价。 Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. |

3楼2016-09-05 20:46:27
4楼2016-09-05 22:16:18
sybgyq
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1838.3
- 散金: 6941
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 2389
- 在线: 693.6小时
- 虫号: 2661254
- 注册: 2013-09-17
- 专业: 通信理论与系统
5楼2016-09-06 09:33:35













回复此楼