| 查看: 2833 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者JeremyZhao将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
JeremyZhao新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求解释审稿人意见。。天线期刊IEEE AWPL论文reject &resubmit
|
|
|
各位虫友，求分析一下审稿人的意见，IEEE AWPL论文reject &resubmit，第一次发帖，只有5.5个金币，不知道市场价如何。。。还希望大家帮忙，金币都拿走 Reviewer(s)\' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author - It would have helped if the authors indicated the correction parts within the revised manuscript. - The paper would gain much more respect from readers if the authors specifically describe how "compact" and "low-profile" your approach is in terms of electrically dimension and ESA theory. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The authors performed HFSS to simulate performance of 17 x 22 x 0.508 cm3 GHz (2.4-7 GHz) antenna, aiming at designing compact multiband slot antennas. They found that the radiation efficiency and bandwidth are in the range of 62.5 to 72.3 % and 90 to 320 MHz, respectively. Regarding the antenna size, there is no advantage of the studied antenna over the antennas already published in the references of this manuscript. The performance of the studied antenna is not much improved as compared with the published antennas. Therefore, there is no technical merit. There is no fresh interpretation of antenna performance, but well-known explanation. The following suggestions may improve the manuscript quality. 1) Give fresh interpretation of antenna performance, i.e. bandwidth, radiation efficiency, isolation, and radiation patterns. 2) Compare antenna performance between published one and the studied one. Explain the reasons why the studied antenna shows better performance than the published ones. 我自己看来审稿人1的态度比较积极，不过我不太清楚他第一条意见"in terms of electrically dimension and ESA theory"是指什么，这个ESA theory是什么意思？哪位业内人士能给解答一下？我还是第一次听说，我能查到的是ESA是指电子扫描阵列(ESA)天线，不过我论文里的是单个天线，不知道跟这个有什么关系呢，怎么联系到这方面的理论？ 审稿人2想要文章Give fresh interpretation of antenna performance，我的论文是根据其他参考文献差不多的阐述方式来写的，不知道这个天线性能方面应该怎么写出fresh的阐述。本文提出的天线主要优势就是尺寸相对于同等性能的尺寸来说比较小。 求各位大神不吝给出高见~，第一篇论文，希望有个好的结果~ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有13人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
30