| 查看: 1066 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 博学EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
zw983226751金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
审稿意见看不懂，求翻译，求指教
|
|
|
1、The table and figure captions are superfluous and need to be more detailed/descriptive. 2、The manuscript: Represents major, significant contribution to the subject: Presents valuable, sound, and original results: X Is not suitable for the scope of Thin Solid Films: Adds little or nothing to knowledge of the subject: Is the manuscript exempt of major errors, faulty judgments, or misleading interpretations? Yes 3、Is it clearly presented, well organized, and clearly written? No 4、Does it contain superfluous material? No 5、If applicable, is the experiment section sufficiently detailed for readers to reproduce experiments and assess quality and relevance of results? No 6、Is sufficient information included or cited to support assertions made and conclusions drawn? No 7、The motivation for the chosen layer structure is not well presented. What are the choices based on? 8、 A simulation of the reflectance profile should be included which could be compared to the measured reflectance. 9、I did not find reference to cyanide as a factor in Si surface passivation in the papers cited. This is not a common factor, so if this is believed to be the case more elaboration should be done on this point. 10、The surface morphology is expected to influence the deposition of the film and hence the film structure and properties. 11、The solar cell performance for the passivated pyramid cell is quite low compared to similar structures in the literature. This may indicate that the sample set is not intercomparable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
292求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料与化工考研调剂
已经有17人回复
-
321求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
329求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料求调剂一志愿哈工大324
已经有8人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
083000学硕274求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿C9材料与化工专业总分300求调剂
已经有9人回复
xunji11
木虫 (正式写手)
- 博学EPI: 1
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1570.2
- 帖子: 349
- 在线: 101.4小时
- 虫号: 320087
- 注册: 2007-03-09
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2016-09-02 09:09:05
xunji11
木虫 (正式写手)
- 博学EPI: 1
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1570.2
- 帖子: 349
- 在线: 101.4小时
- 虫号: 320087
- 注册: 2007-03-09
- 专业: 催化化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zw983226751: 金币+15, 博学EPI+1, ★★★很有帮助, 感谢。只是其中第10条不明白为何意。 2016-09-01 10:27:20
zw983226751: 金币+15, 博学EPI+1, ★★★很有帮助, 感谢。只是其中第10条不明白为何意。 2016-09-01 10:27:20
|
1、The table and figure captions are superfluous and need to be more detailed/descriptive. 表和图的标题需要更加详细的描述。（你原来的是多余的，不能表达详细的信息） 2、The manuscript: Represents major, significant contribution to the subject: Presents valuable, sound, and original results: X Is not suitable for the scope of Thin Solid Films: Adds little or nothing to knowledge of the subject: Is the manuscript exempt of major errors, faulty judgments, or misleading interpretations? Yes 稿件： 代表了大的有意义的对该课题领域的贡献：呈现了有价值的、合理的和原始的结果；是否符合Thin Solid Films的范围：是否稿件不存在大的错误，错误的判断和误导的解释? 是的 3、Is it clearly presented, well organized, and clearly written? No 稿件是不是展示清晰、布局合理和书写清晰？ 不 4、Does it contain superfluous material? No 是否存在不必要的材料？No 5、If applicable, is the experiment section sufficiently detailed for readers to reproduce experiments and assess quality and relevance of results? No 如果可应用的话，是否有详细的实验细节能够让读者重复实验 评价性能并得到相应的结果？ No 6、Is sufficient information included or cited to support assertions made and conclusions drawn? No 是否包括和引用了充足的信息去支持提出的观点和结论？No 7、The motivation for the chosen layer structure is not well presented. What are the choices based on? 选择层状结构的动机没有很好的阐述。是基于什么做得选择？ 8、 A simulation of the reflectance profile should be included which could be compared to the measured reflectance. 需要添加一个反射比曲线的模拟，和测试的反射比相比较。 9、I did not find reference to cyanide as a factor in Si surface passivation in the papers cited. This is not a common factor, so if this is believed to be the case more elaboration should be done on this point. 10、The surface morphology is expected to influence the deposition of the film and hence the film structure and properties. 在文章的参考文献中没有发现有氰化物在Si表面钝化层作为因子的相关文献。这不是一个普通的因子，因此如果这个是个案例的，在这点上需要详述。 11、The solar cell performance for the passivated pyramid cell is quite low compared to similar structures in the literature. This may indicate that the sample set is not intercomparable. 对于钝化氰化物电池而言，和相似结构的文献比较，太阳能电池的性能非常的低。这表明你的这个样品设置是不能相互比较的。 由于我不懂你的文章具体内容，所以只能帮到这了。大体就是这个意思。 |
2楼2016-08-31 10:46:47
gaoxj572
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1650.6
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 558
- 在线: 37.6小时
- 虫号: 4464362
- 注册: 2016-03-04
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 公共管理与公共政策
4楼2016-09-02 09:35:27
