| 查看: 693 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
Diary 8
|
|
2016 - 08 - 29 My previous work about free-space coupling is now accepted by Optics Letters (OL), with suggestion of minor revision. I would say it's definitely a good news, and now I have a real publication `list', with two items (lol). However, when comparing with other articles accepted by OL, a question raised that whether my work worth publishing, or just due to my advisor's personal reputation? OL is a journal covers numerous topics, therefore it's hard for me to give a quantitatively quality check with peer articles; instead, I would say that many articles are interesting to me, while my own is not. Perhaps this could be accounted as the accumulated tiredness for times of revision of the manuscript, or other convincible psychological arguments, but I'm still nervous about my future. I would definitely go to a not-so-bad school fulfilling my PhD, and then postdoc, and then looking for a tenure position, abroad or in China. I don't know what would happen if, which is very probably, I get a position at a place that is not well-known and then submit a work with similar quality as this OL one. My personal judgement is that, it would be rejected and cannot survive even the quick quality check before transferring to topic editor. Honestly, this fear has surrounded me since yesterday when I noticed the acceptance. But for now, I shall keep working, at least making me a better scholar with better works in the future, and better tenure position. The pattern academic society runs is not changeable for me as a nobody. If one day I could be someone, the situation might be much more friendly, and then lead to a real evolution in science. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士去二本高校当辅导员，如何调整心态？
已经有8人回复
-
27细胞生物学申博
已经有5人回复
-
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有5人回复
-
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有11人回复
-
闲聊
已经有3人回复
-
如何查询2026年获批项目名称？
已经有3人回复
-
两块石头
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有15人回复
-
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有13人回复
