| 查看: 618 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
Diary 8
|
|
2016 - 08 - 29 My previous work about free-space coupling is now accepted by Optics Letters (OL), with suggestion of minor revision. I would say it's definitely a good news, and now I have a real publication `list', with two items (lol). However, when comparing with other articles accepted by OL, a question raised that whether my work worth publishing, or just due to my advisor's personal reputation? OL is a journal covers numerous topics, therefore it's hard for me to give a quantitatively quality check with peer articles; instead, I would say that many articles are interesting to me, while my own is not. Perhaps this could be accounted as the accumulated tiredness for times of revision of the manuscript, or other convincible psychological arguments, but I'm still nervous about my future. I would definitely go to a not-so-bad school fulfilling my PhD, and then postdoc, and then looking for a tenure position, abroad or in China. I don't know what would happen if, which is very probably, I get a position at a place that is not well-known and then submit a work with similar quality as this OL one. My personal judgement is that, it would be rejected and cannot survive even the quick quality check before transferring to topic editor. Honestly, this fear has surrounded me since yesterday when I noticed the acceptance. But for now, I shall keep working, at least making me a better scholar with better works in the future, and better tenure position. The pattern academic society runs is not changeable for me as a nobody. If one day I could be someone, the situation might be much more friendly, and then lead to a real evolution in science. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有4人回复
-
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有9人回复
-
同事接到电话了，我却没有
已经有4人回复
-
准备明年的基金了
已经有5人回复
-
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有6人回复
-
时间戳他又来了
已经有11人回复
-
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有15人回复
-
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么？
已经有6人回复
-
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有18人回复
-
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有13人回复
