| 查看: 535 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者学员4tSnhQ将赠送您 30 个金币 | ||
zw983226751金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
Thin solid film 杂志大修意见看不懂，求指教、求翻译
|
|
|
1、The table and figure captions are superfluous and need to be more detailed/descriptive. 2、The manuscript: Represents major, significant contribution to the subject: Presents valuable, sound, and original results: X Is not suitable for the scope of Thin Solid Films: Adds little or nothing to knowledge of the subject: Is the manuscript exempt of major errors, faulty judgments, or misleading interpretations? Yes 3、Is it clearly presented, well organized, and clearly written? No 4、Does it contain superfluous material? No 5、If applicable, is the experiment section sufficiently detailed for readers to reproduce experiments and assess quality and relevance of results? No 6、Is sufficient information included or cited to support assertions made and conclusions drawn? No 7、The motivation for the chosen layer structure is not well presented. What are the choices based on? 8、 A simulation of the reflectance profile should be included which could be compared to the measured reflectance. 9、I did not find reference to cyanide as a factor in Si surface passivation in the papers cited. This is not a common factor, so if this is believed to be the case more elaboration should be done on this point. 10、The surface morphology is expected to influence the deposition of the film and hence the film structure and properties. 11、The solar cell performance for the passivated pyramid cell is quite low compared to similar structures in the literature. This may indicate that the sample set is not intercomparable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿211，化学学硕，310分，本科重点双非，求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
22408 266求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
264求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料工程专业日语生求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
297求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
277、学硕，求调剂 数一104，
已经有12人回复
-
机械专硕273请求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
080100力学316求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
288环境专硕,求调材料方向
已经有39人回复
