| ²é¿´: 1107 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||
Ľ×Ódyľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÓйØLODµÄ¼ÆËã·½·¨Çó½Ì
|
|
¸÷λ³æÓÑ£º ǰÕó×ÓͶÁËÆªÎÄÕ£¬ÓиöÉó¸åÈËÖÊÒÉÎÒÃÇ×îµÍ¼ì²âÏ޵ļÆËã·½·¨£¬ÎÒ֮ǰ²»ÊÇ×ö·ÖÎöµÄ£¬¸øÌá³öÁËÒ»ÖÖÐÂËã·¨£¬µ«ÊÇÌṩµÄÎÄÏ×±íʾ¿´²»¶®°¡£¬ÓÐûÓж®µÄ´óÉñ£¬Âé·³´Í½ÌÏ£¬¶àл¶àл£¡£¡£¡ Éó¸åÈ˸ø³öµÄcommentsÊÇÕâÑù×ӵģº¡°The LOD seems to be estimated using the old, now abandoned, IUPAC definition. Please adhere to modern standards, by using the accepted IUPAC recommendations based on types I and II errors (false positives and false negatives) quoted in L. A. Currie, Recommendations in Evaluation of Analytical Methods including Detection and Quantification Capabilities, Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67, 1699-1723. In any case, the LOD for the present method is reported as 8.27 ppm, i.e., whit an unreasonably large number of significant figures. ¡± |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÄÏ´ó»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÁòËáÄÆÈÜҺŨ¶ÈÓëÃܶÈÇúÏß
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ64È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
1
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
0703 µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷ÄÏij211ÕÐ27½ì²©Ê¿
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
´óÁ¬¹¤Òµ½ÜÇà/³¤½ÍŶÓ-ÉúÎïÖʲÄÁÏ-´¢ÄÜµç³Ø·½ÏòÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸º£´ó£¬0703»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶304·Ö£¬Óдó´´ÏîÄ¿£¬Ëļ¶Òѹý
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
lyp7606
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1226.3
- Ìû×Ó: 73
- ÔÚÏß: 113.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1024949
- ×¢²á: 2010-05-21
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
2Â¥2018-04-16 17:22:19
СÄÁСľ
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5310.6
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 1989
- ÔÚÏß: 290.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3139572
- ×¢²á: 2014-04-15
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
3Â¥2018-05-07 00:45:29













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥