24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

漫步云端008

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3.3
散金: 30
帖子: 31
在线: 33.4小时
虫号: 3160673
注册: 2014-04-24
专业: 无机非金属基复合材料

[交流] 第一篇sci编辑初审后让修改重投，求助分析。已有3人参与

本人的第一篇sci，是关于真空镀膜的文章。2天前投稿vacuum杂志，今天收到主编的回信，说文章与另外两篇文章研究内容有些相似，其中一篇是实验室师姐的理论计算文章，另一篇研究内容有些相似，但是制备工艺完全不同，因此个人认为还有有必要研究的。另外主编还让补做一TEM测试，但是由于薄膜是磁控溅射制备的，300nm，镀在硅片上的，结合力强，刮不下来。。。做TEM希望不大。但总觉得主编认为我文章没有新意，让修改后重新提交。不知道这样投的希望大不大，还请各位经验丰富虫友给仔细分析下，多谢！没有金币了。。。各位见谅。
附邮件部分内容：
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Vacuum. I have pre-reviewed your manuscript and found that it is much related to your Ref 18。。This makes us wonder what is the novelty of the present work.
I invite you to resubmit your manuscript after relating the work to literature and to present additional results and discussion that more substantially advances the understanding as opposed to incremental publishing.Also, the highlights need to be written for more novelty.
When resubmitting your manuscript, please carefully consider all issues mentioned in the reviewers' comments, outline every change made point by point, and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed.
初次投稿，请多指教。谢谢！

回复此楼