24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者aygxy_lhc将赠送您 14 个金币

aygxy_lhc

铁虫 (正式写手)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 210.1
散金: 1116
红花: 4
帖子: 482
在线: 826.3小时
虫号: 2483088
注册: 2013-05-26
专业: 化工热力学和基础数据

[求助] 请教高手如下的审稿意见因怎样回复，不甚感激! 已有4人参与

文章大修后，
审稿人同意接受了：
The revised manuscript was improved and thus suitable for the publication.
However, fig, the abbreviation of figure is considerably misused in the manuscript.
Some fig in the manuscript should be replaced with figure when it is the first word in a sentence; this should be considered in proof-reading process.

今天接到编辑的回信(有删减)：
I have received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript. They agree that your paper is eligible for publication.
(1) However, I found that your manuscript needs a work in rendering the English writing clear and consistently intelligible.
I am therefore returning the manuscript to you for English proofreading prior to final decision.
(2) Please improve your manuscript title for better search engine results and higher citation potential and to be more attractive
to the chemical engineering society.

自己能解决的问题就不列了，上面两个问题不会回答，请指教！

另外，编辑让提供修改说明：Please submit a list of changes when you submit the revised manuscript.

那么这次回信, cover letter 和 response to comment 有没有好一些的模板，请提供一下吧！

本人菜鸟，还请高手不吝赐教，金币奉上！

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

SCI审稿意见回复

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2016-08-14 00:04:54

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
SEPI: 1
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345462
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127553
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
aygxy_lhc: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2016-08-14 07:58:54

修改稿Cover letter模板

Dear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:
On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号). We have studied the editor and reviewer’s comments carefully, and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.
We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
××××××

Response to comment模板

Dear Editor and Reviewers,
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the editor and reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Respond to the editor's comments:
1.However, I found that your manuscript needs a work in rendering the English writing clear and consistently intelligible.
I am therefore returning the manuscript to you for English proofreading prior to final decision.
Response:
2. Please improve your manuscript title for better search engine results and higher citation potential and to be more attractive
to the chemical engineering society.
Response: We have changed the manuscript title accordingly.
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
......
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：
We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……
We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.
We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that……
Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：
Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
××××××
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.