| ²é¿´: 2060 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
490718204гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÔõôÑùʹÓÃÈýµç¼«²âÊÔµç³ØµÄ½»Á÷×迹£¬ËüÓëÁ½µç¼«²âÊÔ½»Á÷×迹µÄÓÅȱµã ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Éó¸åÈË˵ÎÒµÄµç³Ø²»Äܹ»ÓÃÁ½µç¼«À´²âÊÔ£¬ÐèÒªÓÃÈýµç¼«£¬ I know that the author use the article 39 as reference to support this comments, but also in this article they use a two electro cell, that is not the right way to do an impedance measurement. I think that this improvement is in the sodium anode electrode. The use of two electrode for the impedance analysis cause that the real impedance that you are observing is the effect of both, anode and cathode, so a three electrode measurement is necessary to understand this procedure. Çë¿´ÉÏÃæËû˵ֻÓÐÈýµç¼«²ÅÄܹ»²âÇå³þ£¬µ«ÊÇÒ»°ãµÄ¹ØÓÚµç³ØµÄÎÄÕ¶¼ÊÇÁ½µç¼«Ìåϵ£¬Çó´óÉñ°ïæ½â¾öÔõôʹÓÃÈýµç¼«²âÊÔ£¬»¹ÓÐÓз½·¨Ëµ·þÉó¸åÈËÓÃÁ½µç¼«µÄÒ²ÐС£Ð»Ð»¸÷·´óÉñ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Òâ´óÀû²©ÂåÄáÑÇ´óѧÕÐÆ¸Ñо¿ÖúÀí2Ãû£¨2D²ÄÁÏ/ï®Àë×ÓÓëÄÆÀë×Óµç³Ø·½Ïò£©
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚ̼Á¿×ӵ㿹¾úµÄÑо¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ137È˻ظ´
ÄÏ´ó»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÁòËáÄÆÈÜҺŨ¶ÈÓëÃܶÈÇúÏß
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
1
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
0703 µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷ÄÏij211ÕÐ˶ʿ¡¢²©Ê¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÒÀÈ»Óö¼û
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 52.6
- É¢½ð: 142
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 121
- ÔÚÏß: 117.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1709335
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-22
2Â¥2016-09-08 21:28:19
123just
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 133 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2908.7
- É¢½ð: 20
- ºì»¨: 26
- Ìû×Ó: 508
- ÔÚÏß: 213.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1159825
- ×¢²á: 2010-12-01
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§

3Â¥2016-09-09 15:28:52
Ò»Ö±¶¼ÔÚ·ÉÏ
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 20096.3
- É¢½ð: 1276
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 3238
- ÔÚÏß: 211.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 5143531
- ×¢²á: 2016-10-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2019-01-14 16:57:31
Ò»Ö±¶¼ÔÚ·ÉÏ
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 20096.3
- É¢½ð: 1276
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 3238
- ÔÚÏß: 211.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 5143531
- ×¢²á: 2016-10-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
5Â¥2019-01-14 17:08:46













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥