| 查看: 335 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者包子_叶将赠送您 50 个金币 | ||
[求助]
求助，大神帮忙看看到底应该怎么改啊，要不然要被据了！石油化工方向
|
||
|
不明白审稿人到底想让我把图怎么改，审稿人一审意见：My last comment relates to Fig.2 which summarizes the results of the? experiments. It is a wrong manner to draw broken lines connecting? experimental points.?It is much better and reasonable?to show a possible? confidence interval and then?to draw a smooth line. At any rate,?the? statistics for experimental points should be specified because it seems? to me that now experimenters began to forget that any experimental? result has the meaning only when you show possible errors of measuring. 审稿人二审意见： The addition of some words about confidence limit is formal? and is not satisfactory.? First, the addition written in red again is not acceptatble due to its poor English.? I strongly recommend to improve the English in new texts.? Then I wrote that it is a bad tradition to join experimental points by? broken lines instead of drawing averaged smooth lines in Figs 1 and 2.? For example, I do not beleive in the hump in Fig. 2.? 哪位大神给指条明路啊！ @Monash2011 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有12人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有4人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有29人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有9人回复
-
是这周出结果还是下周出结果？
已经有3人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有9人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有4人回复
-
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有13人回复
-
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有7人回复
-
读博的好处
已经有3人回复
