| 查看: 469 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者lxt蓝夏瞳将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
lxt蓝夏瞳木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
请大家帮忙看看修改意见，修改后中的概率大不大？
|
|
|
投了energy，给了大修，意见如下，请大家帮忙看看，有些意见不太明白什么意思 Reviewers' comments Reviewer #2: This paper is interesting but they are a lot of methods that should be described. In section 1 (Introduction), the authors should describe all statistical methods existing in the literature (they are a lot of references about wind power prediction methods -of course, with current references), in order to study the topic much more in detail. Please, include them and highlighting their main achievements. Besides, there is no evidence that other statistical methods unanalyzed not have a wind power forecasting error of less than 3.893%. Are the authors sure that their method is the best to predict wind power? If a revised paper is done, please improve the conclusions for EGY readers. Relative to formal aspects: 1. Please, include the nomenclature list. 2. English should be revised. Reviewer #4: Comments and Recomendations: 1) The paper reports an interesting research work which I consider original and relevant to the scope of ENERGY. 2) I suggest a careful revision of the english in the manuscript 3) A more precise and detailed definition of the objective of the paper is required. It can be included as a section before of the Proposed Methodology section. 4) An appropriate reviewing of literature is provided and the past works carried out by others in the same field are properly acknowledged. However, a careful revision of the quotations and the reference list is recomended (for example, the work by Cao is quoted and the reference is present, but the reference number was not associated properly). Reviewer #5: - Some of the presented results are poorly discussed. Fig. 2 and 3 needs further discussion and analysis. - Compare the work with other researcher findings. The main findings to be summarized and compared with other methods. Better in the form of table comparing the main parameters. - Conclusion to be revised and enhanced. The conclusions have to be much focused. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有5人回复
-
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有5人回复
-
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变？做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
-
求合成方法
已经有7人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有12人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复