24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3292  |  回复: 23
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 rzchn 的 57 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

rzchn

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 漫漫投稿路,投稿悲剧,大家给看看拒稿意见

5月初投的一篇macromolecular rapid communications,今天得知被拒,两个审稿人一个建议接受,一个让转投。感觉还是做得东西创新不够,希望自己能攒攒人品得来好运气。发点金币求个安慰
下面是返回的意见:
Please rate the importance of this submission.
>
> Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal
> 其他只提了一些语法问题,还是比较温和的
> Reviewer #2: Should be submitted elsewhere
Unfortunately, I am unable to recommend publication of this work in Macromolecular Rapid Commun. In short (i) the there are no new or surprising results at all in the paper and (ii) it is not clear at all what major and important findings the present work adds to the field.
>
> There is really a lot of work ongoing that focuses on the use of some sort of nanomaterial (be it a polymer micelle or something else)that incorporate both a chemotherapeutic and a photosensitizer. A quick search in Web of Science gives close to a 100 papers..... . Yes, the particles in this paper do kill cancers cells, but so do the 99 other papers. What is new, other than maybe the specific type of polymer used ? A new polymer alone (without clearly showing the benefits in a quantitative comparison with the state of the art in the field) is not sufficient reason for publication.
In addition to this, the English is really far way from what one would consider acceptable for a paper in a high impact factor journal.
不知道the state of the art in the field是什么意思,求告解
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

米蘭的小鐵匠

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

无门无派!


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
估计审稿人是把这个科研领域的工作看成是一项艺术性的活。
9楼2016-07-04 13:51:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 24 个回答

latecomer

木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
rzchn: 金币+5 2016-07-03 21:42:34
最先进的,最新的。
2楼2016-07-03 21:29:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

我来学习的

银虫 (正式写手)

★ ★ ★
rzchn: 金币+3 2016-07-03 21:44:52
不好弄,改投吧

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
好好学习,天天向上!
3楼2016-07-03 21:32:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rzchn

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 我来学习的 at 2016-07-03 21:32:54
不好弄,改投吧

哎,改投是肯定的了,还要把communication改回article
4楼2016-07-03 21:44:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +6 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 6/300 2026-08-15 10:09 by tuanggou
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +5 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 6/300 2026-08-15 09:28 by sunzitan
[公派出国] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 07:09 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] filecode +7 cratir 2026-08-14 11/550 2026-08-15 06:19 by 学员8dgXkO
[考博] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 04:45 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 04:17 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 02:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 22/1100 2026-08-14 23:45 by Noways
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +4 lnee 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-14 10:20 by ahsoarli
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +10 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 32/1600 2026-08-14 09:37 by 要乐观耀哥
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 这样的filecode谁见过 +11 布布和一二 2026-08-08 22/1100 2026-08-10 11:10 by wmfsnow
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
信息提示
请填处理意见