| 查看: 362 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者njuchemrabbit将赠送您 13 个金币 | ||
njuchemrabbit木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
回稿意见修改求助，急
|
|
|
如题，投稿至Journal of coordination chemistry，回稿意见中给出以下三个问题 The non-refined data have not been removed from tables S1 . Rather than including the refined positions of H2A and H5A and their hydrogen bonds in the discussion of the structure, the authors placed these hydrogen atoms in fixed positions eliminating the value of the interactions. The authors have provided some information regarding the use of SQUEEZE, but it is insufficient. The removal of 63 electrons from the unit cell does not make sense. Three acetonitrile molecules would be 66 electrons and an odd number of molecules does not agree with the space group unless some of the molecules removed occured in special positions. Further, there are still acetonitrile molecules in the structure. Does this mean that there were more than two acetonitrile molecules per formula unit present? 求助高手予以解决，谢谢！ 晶体数据及表格可以邮箱联系，多谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复