24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zillionlin

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 57.4
散金: 98
红花: 1
帖子: 104
在线: 28.8小时
虫号: 789607
注册: 2009-06-08
专业: 比较教育学

[求助] APL 169天了，二审结束审稿人忽然改变审稿意见了，第三次审稿又增加审稿人了已有4人参与

本来一直想等着文章有结果了发个帖子描述一下这次超长的apl审稿过程，结果现在时间还在增加，结果却依然不明朗。
一审两个审稿人，一个飞快审完，一个拖了快两个月，两人都很认真，给的意见都是正面的，两人都提出了类似的问题和修改意见，认真回复并修改以后，进入二审，那个很慢的审稿人，居然又差点跳票。这个审稿人前后判若两人，意见里说他忽然觉得我们的文章和我们之前的工作一样，所以把之前正面的意见全推翻，所有选项都选成no了，于是我们花了快两周时间详细和他说了区别，另外一个审稿人建议发表，下面是之前的二审过程，
Revised Manuscript Received from Author 12-Jun-2016 21:44:12
Waiting for Revised Manuscript from Author 22-May-2016 15:17:31
Decision Sent to Author 22-May-2016 15:17:30
Decision Letter Being Prepared 22-May-2016 15:11:53
Associate Editor Decision Completed 22-May-2016 15:11:53
Associate Editor Decision Started 22-May-2016 11:20:59
All Reviews Received 22-May-2016 11:20:59
Review Received 11-May-2016 18:59:54
All Reviewers Secured 02-May-2016 13:36:53
Review Started 02-May-2016 13:36:53
Potential Reviewer Agreed to Review 02-May-2016 13:36:53
Reviewer Assignment Started 01-May-2016 17:14:53
Additional Reviewers Needed 01-May-2016 17:14:53
Potential Reviewer No Response to Invitation 01-May-2016 17:14:49
Review Started 25-Apr-2016 00:49:06
Potential Reviewer Agreed to Review 25-Apr-2016 00:49:06
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 24-Apr-2016 22:45:04
Potential Reviewers Selected 23-Apr-2016 10:57:54
Reviewer Assignment Started 15-Apr-2016 11:58:17
Securing Associate Editor 15-Apr-2016 11:58:17
Securing Editor 15-Apr-2016 11:58:17
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 15-Apr-2016 11:58:17
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 15-Apr-2016 11:23:09
Securing Editor 15-Apr-2016 11:23:09
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 15-Apr-2016 11:23:06
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 15-Apr-2016 10:58:37

二审结束，我们回复后现在是下面这个情况，今天早上起来一看，发现居然又多找了一个审稿人，
Reviewer Assignment Started 23-Jun-2016 16:04:56
Additional Reviewers Needed 23-Jun-2016 16:04:56
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent 23-Jun-2016 16:03:50
Potential Reviewers Selected 23-Jun-2016 09:25:47
Reviewer Assignment Started 13-Jun-2016 09:57:12
Securing Associate Editor 13-Jun-2016 09:57:12
Securing Editor 13-Jun-2016 09:57:12
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 13-Jun-2016 09:57:12
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 12-Jun-2016 22:04:56
Securing Editor 12-Jun-2016 22:04:56
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 12-Jun-2016 22:04:55
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 12-Jun-2016 21:44:12

每次都认真详细回复，文章也是认真完成且结果也有重大创新意义的，真心觉得审稿人的反复无常让人很受打击，不知道有没有人遇到这种情况。
首先是169天了。。。这样接收的概率还有多大？
其次审稿人前后意见相反，而且不是基于我们的回复不好而得出相反结论，而是他自己忽然觉得自己之前的审稿意见需要改动，认为我们解析的模型和之前类似（做解析都是用写规则的图形，能解的就是圆的球的一类的东西，长得像但是结论完全没关系啊。。。）。。。现在编辑再多找一个人是不是不确定？这种情况下到底有没有明朗的结果？
心里没底，发帖看看大家的分析，也为文章祈福。
先提前谢谢大家了。

回复此楼