| 查看: 524 | 回复: 1 | ||
luyi1967314铁虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请帮忙翻译 已有1人参与
|
|
我最近有一篇论文投稿，主编要求修改，但我英文水平很差，无法按要求修改，请高手将其翻译成中文；本人将不胜感激！ Dear Dr. Lu, We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "Research Goldbach's Conjecture based on equivalent proposition (二)", which you submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences. Based on the advice received, I feel that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which can be found below, and submit a list of responses to the comments. You are kindly requested to also check the website for possible reviewer attachment(s). Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX). In order to submit your revised manuscript, please access the following web site: http://nasa.edmgr.com/ Your username is: ******** Your password is: ******** We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript before 08 Jul 2016. With kind regards, Jai Pal Mittal, Ph.D Editor in Chief Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: 1. lot of typographic errors are there. All should be corrected 2. In the proof, the case l1 < L2 redundant as l1 is greater than zero by induction hypothesis, you have taken L1<L2 therefore l2>0 (obviously) 3. More over, referring to the reference 4, the same statement is proved by mathematical induction. How your method is different from that. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
Edstrayer
版主 (著名写手)
方寸斗室小天地正气迷漫大世界
- 数学EPI: 7
- 应助: 157 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.927
- 金币: 9349.6
- 散金: 4503
- 红花: 77
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 2745
- 在线: 1465.6小时
- 虫号: 3086598
- 注册: 2014-03-25
- 管辖: 数学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
luyi1967314: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2016-06-12 14:42:59
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
luyi1967314: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2016-06-12 14:42:59
|
Dear Dr. Lu, 亲爱的路博士： We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "Research Goldbach's Conjecture based on equivalent proposition (二)", which you submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences. 关于你的论文“基于等价命题的Goldbach猜想的研究（二）”，就是你投稿给“印度国家科学院汇刊，A辑，物理科学”的论文，我们已经从指导教师那里收到了报告。 Based on the advice received, I feel that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which can be found below, and submit a list of responses to the comments. You are kindly requested to also check the website for possible reviewer attachment(s). 根据收到的审稿意见，我觉得为了公开出版，你的论文能够被考虑你应该准备包含主要的修改意见。在准备你的修改稿时，要求你仔细考虑能够在下面找到的评审意见，并且提交对评论的回应列表。对于可能的评审附件，也友善地要求你检查网址。 Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX). 请确保提交你的可编辑源文件（即Word或者Tex格式的源文件）。 In order to submit your revised manuscript, please access the following web site: 请通过下面的网址提交你的修改稿。 http://nasa.edmgr.com/ Your username is: ******** Your password is: ******** We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript before 08 Jul 2016. 我们期盼在2016年7月8号之前收到你的修改稿。 With kind regards, Jai Pal Mittal, Ph.D Editor in Chief 主编，Jai Pal Mittal博士 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences 印度国家科学院汇刊，A辑，物理科学 COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: 对作者的补充： Reviewer #1: 1. lot of typographic errors are there. All should be corrected 评审者#1：有一些印刷错误，这都应该修正。i 2. In the proof, the case l1 < L2 redundant as l1 is greater than zero by induction hypothesis, you have taken L1<L2 therefore l2>0 (obviously) 2.在证明中，情形 你已经得到 3. More over, referring to the reference 4, the same statement is proved by mathematical induction. How your method is different from that. 3.更进一步地，参考参考文献[4]，使用数学归纳法可以证明同样的命题。你的方法与那里的方法有什么不同？ 全文翻译如下： 亲爱的路博士： 关于你的论文“基于等价命题的Goldbach猜想的研究（二）”，就是你投稿给“印度国家科学院汇刊，A辑，物理科学”的论文，我们已经从指导教师那里收到了报告。根据收到的审稿意见，我觉得为了公开出版，你的论文能够被考虑你应该准备包含主要的修改意见。在准备你的修改稿时，要求你仔细考虑能够在下面找到的评审意见，并且提交对评论的回应列表。对于可能的评审附件，也友善地要求你检查网址。 请确保提交你的可编辑源文件（即Word或者Tex格式的源文件）。 请通过下面的网址提交你的修改稿。 http://nasa.edmgr.com/ 你的用户名是: ******** 你的密码是: ******** 我们期盼在2016年7月8号之前收到你的修改稿。 主编，Jai Pal Mittal博士 印度国家科学院汇刊，A辑，物理科学 对作者的补充： 评审者#1：有一些印刷错误，这都应该修正。i 2.在证明中，情形 你已经得到 3.更进一步地，参考参考文献[4]，使用数学归纳法可以证明同样的命题。你的方法与那里的方法有什么不同？ |
2楼2016-06-11 14:34:45